green
Positive treatment
12.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "see"
Dowling v. Heirs of Bond
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260, 284 , 873 A.2d 208 (referring to cases involving ‘‘a claim of adverse possession seeking title to the fee of the land over which an easement existed, which claim, if successful, could operate indirectly to extinguish the easement’’ (emphasis omitted)), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 , and cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005); id. (‘‘[i]f there is adverse possession sufficient to divest a fee simple title to land, it will also operate to extinguish an easement in such land’’ (internal quotation marks omitted))…
discussed
Cited "see"
Labissoniere v. Gaylord Hospital, Inc.
(2×)
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260 , 285 n.20, 873 A.2d 208 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005), and cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005). 9 The plaintiffs’ claim brings to mind a story attributed to Abraham Lincoln.
discussed
Cited "see"
Szymonik v. Szymonik
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn.App. 260 , 285 n. 20, 873 A.2d 208 (noting this court's policy that precedent set by one panel of this court generally should be overruled only after en banc hearing), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pellecchia v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
(2×)
See, in contrast, Blinkoff v. O & G Industries, Inc., [ 89 Conn. App. 251, 259 , 873 A.2d 1009 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 907 , 882 A. 2d 668 (2005)] (plaintiff later complied with discovery-requests after prior lack of diligence and lack of adherence to court orders).
discussed
Cited "see"
Forster v. Gianopoulos
(2×)
In determining the proportionality of a sanction to a violation, we have in the past considered the severity of the sanction imposed and the materiality of the evidence sought; Message Center Management, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co., 85 Conn. App. 401, 412 , 857 A.2d 936 (2004); whether the violation was inadvertent or wilful; McVerry v. Charash, 96 Conn. App. 589, 598 , 901 A.2d 69 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 934 , 909 A.2d 961 (2006); see Blinkoff v. O & G Industries, Inc., 89 Conn. App. 251, 259 , 873 A.2d 1009 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 907 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005); and whether the absence of …
discussed
Cited "see"
Wieselman v. Hoeniger
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260, 292 , 873 A.2d 208 (trier free to accept or reject, in whole or in part, testimony offered by either party), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005).
cited
Cited "see"
Mierzejewski v. Brownell
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260, 283 , 873 A.2d 208 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005); Public Storage, Inc. v. Eliot Street Ltd.
discussed
Cited "see"
Waldman v. Beck
See Waldman v. Jayaraj, 89 Conn. App. 709, 712 , 874 A.2d 860 (summary judgment properly granted in action brought pursuant to General Statutes § 52-592, accidental failure of suit statute, because action not timely filed), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 907 , 882 A.2d 680 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
American Diamond Exchange, Inc. v. Alpert
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260, 292 , 873 A.2d 208 (“[t]he trier is free to accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony offered by either party” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.
See Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260, 284 , 873 A.2d 208 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005), distinguishing Goodwin v. Bragaw, 87 Conn. 31 , 86 A. 668 (1913), and Gemmell v. Lee, supra, 59 Conn. App. 572 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Eberhart v. Meadow Haven, Inc.
As we noted previously, “the claimant’s possession need notbe absolutely exclusive; it need only be a type of possession which would characterize an owner’s use.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Roche v. Fairfield, supra, 186 Conn. 502 ; see also Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260 , 289 n.23, 873 A.2d 208 (“[i]n adverse-possession doctrine, the exclusivity requirement describes the behavior of an ordinary possessor and serves to give notice to the owner” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
(2×)
See also Boccanfuso v. Conner, 89 Conn. App. 260 , 285 n.20, 873 A.2d 208 (noting this court’s policy that precedent set by one panel of this court generally should be overruled only after en banc hearing), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 905 , 882 A.2d 668 (2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Holly J. Blinkoff Et Al.
v.
O and G Industries, Inc.
v.
O and G Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 12, 2005.
Everett E. Newton, in support of the petition., Holly J. Blinkoff, pro se, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 89 Conn. App. 251 (AC 24858), is denied.
[*908] Decided September 12, 2005 Everett E. Newton, in support of the petition. Holly J. Blinkoff, pro se, in opposition.