State v. Francis, 883 A.2d 1248 (Conn. 2005). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Francis, 883 A.2d 1248 (Conn. 2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Vivo (connappct, 2020-05-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Vivo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 167, 177 , 876 A.2d 1216 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1253 (2005).
cited Cited "see" State v. Vivo
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 167, 177 , 876 A.2d 1216 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 888 A.2d 1253 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Samuel (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vivo v. Commissioner of Correction, 90 Conn. App. 167, 177 , 876 A.2d 1216 , cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1253 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Purvis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Jimenez, 73 Conn. App. 664 , 667–68, 808 A.2d 1190 (affirming conviction pursuant to § 21a- 278 (b) (1) (A) when only evidence presented was plas- tic bag of cocaine found in backseat of police cruiser after defendant’s transport to police station), cert. denied, 262 Conn. 929 , 814 A.2d 381 (2002); see also State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676 , 682–83, 879 A.2d 457 (concluding that evidence was sufficient to support conviction of possession of narcotics with intent to sell within 1500 feet of school when no sale was alleged to have been made), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 ,…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Martinez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 682-83 , 879 A.2d 457 (expert testimony that “drug dealers often will stash their drugs in a hidden location so that if they are stopped by the police, they can claim that they are not in possession of drugs”), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005); State v. Waden, 84 Conn. App. 147, 153-54 , 852 A.2d 817 (“the state presented expert testimony that it is common for a street level drug dealer to keep a ‘stash’ of narcotics in an area close to where he is selling, rather than have a significant quantity on his person”), cer…
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Myers
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 688-89 , 879 A.2d 457 (approving similar instruction as balanced and fair), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Hedge
Conn. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
Although the large quantity of drugs that the police found in the defendant’s vehicle supports an inference that the defendant had intended to sell the drugs somewhere; see, e.g., State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676, 682 , 879 A.2d 457 (quantity of narcotics and manner of packaging indicative of intent to sell), cert. denied, 275 Conn. 925 , 883 A.2d 1248 (2005); it was insufficient to support a finding that he had intended to sell them within 1500 feet of Marina Village.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
STANFORD D. FRANCIS
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2005.
883 A.2d 1248
James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Proloy K. Das, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 676 (AC 24668), is denied.

[*926] Decided September 20, 2005 James B. Streeto, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Proloy K. Das, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.