green
Positive treatment
2.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kaye v. Fast Food Operators, Inc.
N.Y.1976), aff’d, 556 F.2d 554, 555 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Kamerman v. Steinberg
See British Airways Bd. v. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, 71 F.R.D. 583, 585 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Envirotech Corp. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
See Boise Cascade Corp. v. Wheeler, 419 F.Supp. 98, 103 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Usery v. Brandel
Accord, British Airways Board v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, 71 F.R.D. 583, 585 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir- 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weitzman v. Stein
See Bonime v. Doyle, 416 F.Supp. 1372, 1384 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), affd without opinion, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir. 1977); Abrahamson v. Fleschner, 392 F.Supp. 740, 747 (S.D.N.Y. 1975), modified on other grounds, 568 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1977) (no uniform rule of damages applicable to all 10b-5 actions). 11 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. RJR Nabisco, Inc.
See, e.g., Bonime v. Doyle, 416 F.Supp. 1372, 1387 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 924 , 98 S.Ct. 401 , 54 L.Ed.2d 281 (1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Massaro v. Vernitron Corp.
Compare Bonime v. Doyle, S.D.N.Y. 1976, 416 F.Supp. 1372, 1384-1386 , aff’d without opinion, 2 Cir.1977, 556 F.2d 554 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,357 Marbury Management, Inc., and Harry Bader, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Appellees v. Alfred Kohn, and Wood, Walker & Co.
(2×)
See also Bonime v. Doyle, 416 F.Supp. 1372 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir. 1977), where the district court approved the settlement of a class action securities fraud suit over objection that the recovery was too meager, noting that while the stock purchases may have been fraudulently induced, the damages might in large measure have been attributable to other causes unrelated to the alleged misstatements.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Steinberg v. Carey
Compare Bonime v. Doyle, 416 F.Supp. 1372, 1384-86 (S.D.N.Y.1976), aff'd mem., 556 F.2d 554 (2d Cir. 1977) (class action; out-of-pocket rule) and Tucker v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 67 F.R.D. 468, 482 (S.D.N.Y.1975) (semble) with Reeder v. Mastercraft Elecs.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blecker
v.
Lazard Freres & Co
v.
Lazard Freres & Co
76-7574.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 14, 1977.
556 F.2d 554
Published
Blecker
v.
Lazard Freres & Co.
No. 76-7574
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
3/14/77
1
S.D.N.Y.
REMANDED