green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1977 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1977
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Serafini
(3×)
Id. at 196. 17 The principal thrust of the indictment was that the defendants had conspired to bribe, threaten and convince certain witnesses to refuse to cooperate with a law enforcement investigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. Murphy (In Re Selheimer & Co.)
See Ruth v. Crane, 392 F.Supp. 724, 733 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff'd 564 F.2d 90 (3d Cir.1977) (where no proper certificate of limited partnership has been filed, the limited partnership is not formed, and the parties are treated as general partners as to third persons and creditors); accord Kornstein v. Taylor, 68 D. & C.2d 7, 12 (1974) ("[A]s a matter of law ... the failure of plaintiffs to sign the certificate of limited partnership ... renders them general partners as to third persons, including creditors.”) 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stitzer
See United States v. Hewitt, 663 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir.1981) (judgment of acquittal not required merely because government’s case includes testimony by “an array of scoundrels, liars and brigands.”) (quoting United States v. Tiche, 424 F.Supp. 996, 1000-01 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd mem. 564 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977). 2.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stitzer
See United States v. Hewitt, 663 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir.1981) (judgment of acquittal not required merely because government's case includes testimony by "an array of scoundrels, liars and brigands.") (quoting United States v. Tiche, 424 F.Supp. 996, 1000-01 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd mem. 564 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977). 51 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matthews v. Freedman
See also Ruth v. Crane, 392 F.Supp. 724, 731-32 (E.D.Pa.1975) (Broderick, J.), aff’d 564 F.2d 90 (3d Cir.1977) (referring attorney to disciplinary board for professional misconduct); United States v. Bowers, 517 F.Supp. 666, 672 (W.D.Pa.1981) (same); In re Direct Satellite Communications, Inc., 96 B.R. 507, 525 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa.1989) (same); In re Tigue, 82 B.R. 724, 732-34 (Bkrtcy.E.D.Pa. 1988) (same). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schlag v. Mendelson (In re Schlag)
Meara v. Hewitt, 455 Pa. 132 , 314 A.2d 263 (1974); Kribbs v. Jackson, 387 Pa. 611 , 129 A.2d 490 (1957); Lynch v. Hook, 298 Pa.Super. 27 , 444 A.2d 157 (1982); See also, Ruth v. Crane, 392 F.Supp. 724 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff 'd 564 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gardner v. Surnamer
See 59 Pa.Cons.Stat.Ann. § 512(b) (Purdon Supp.1984); see also Ruth v. Crane, 392 F.Supp. 724, 733 (E.D.Pa.1975), aff’d., 564 F.2d 90 (3rd Cir.1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
U. S. Ex Rel. Johnson
v.
Hatrak
v.
Hatrak
77-1468.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Sep 19, 1977.
564 F.2d 90
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
U. S. ex rel. Johnson
v.
Hatrak
No. 77-1468, 76-2605
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
9/19/77
D.N.J., 417 F.Supp. 316
AFFIRMED