Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. B. Levens, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar v. B. Levens, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina, U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
37 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Smith v. Tolley (vaed, 1997-04-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Smith v. Tolley
E.D. Va. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
Love v. Commonwealth, 212 Va. 492 , 184 S.E.2d 769, 771 (1971) (quoting Jones v. Commonwealth, 141 Va. 471 , 126 S.E. 74, 77 (1925)); see Darnell v. Phillips, 914 F.2d 247 , 1990 WL 134599 (4th Cir.1990) (unpublished opinion).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re Edmond
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Consumer Protection, 304 Md. at 781 , 501 A.2d at 74 ; Andrews, 73 Md.App. at 87-89 , 533 A.2d at 286 ; see also Attorney General of Maryland v. Dickson, 717 F.Supp. 1090, 1105-06 (D.Md.1989), appeal dismissed, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir.1990) (suggesting that under the Act consumers are prohibited from receiving a "windfall" or "double return").
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edmond v. Consumer Protection Division (In re Edmond)
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Consumer Protection, 304 Md. at 781 , 501 A.2d at 74 ; Andrews, 73 Md.App. at 87-89 , 533 A.2d at 286 ; see also Attorney General of Maryland v. Dickson, 717 F.Supp. 1090, 1105-06 (D.Md.1989), appeal dismissed, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir.1990) (suggesting that under the Act consumers are prohibited from receiving a “windfall” or “double return”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edmond v. Consumer Protection Division
4th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Consumer Protection, 304 Md. at 781 , 501 A.2d at 74 ; Andrews, 73 Md.App. at 87-89 , 533 A.2d at 286 ; see also Attorney General of Maryland v. Dickson, 717 F.Supp. 1090, 1105-06 (D.Md.1989), appeal dismissed, 914 F.2d 247 (4th Cir.1990) (suggesting that under the Act consumers are prohibited from receiving a “windfall” or “double return”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar
v.
B. Levens, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina, U.S. Bureau of Prisons
89-6714.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 19, 1990.
914 F.2d 247
Unpublished

914 F.2d 247
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Muhammad Jalal Deen AKBAR, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
B. LEVENS, Acting Warden, F.C.I., Butner, North Carolina,
U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6714.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 31, 1989.
Decided Sept. 19, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. John D. Larkins, Jr., Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 89-392-CRT)

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar, appellant pro se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Muhammad Jalal Deen Akbar appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Akbar v. Levens, C/A No. 89-392-CRT (E.D.N.C. June 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.