green
Positive treatment
4.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Perlman v. General Electric
See Keys v. Eastman Kodak Co., 739 F. Supp. 135, 139 (W.D.N.Y. 1990) aff’d 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir. 1990) (the plan need not disclose materials to an agent prior to receiving satisfactory proof of the agent’s 7 authority).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Ames Department Stores, Inc.
See United States Shoe Corp. v. Brown Group, Inc., 740 F.Supp. 196, 198 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sports Authority, Inc. v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc.
See The United States Shoe Corp. v. Brown Group, Inc., 740 F.Supp. 196, 200 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir.1990) (“The fact that defendant’s print advertisement includes prominent references to its own distinctive brand name makes it even less likely that consumers will confuse defendant’s ad as coming from the same source as plaintiff’s advertisements.”). 4.
discussed
Cited "see"
Beate Bernheim v. Jeffrey Litt
(2×)
See Castro v. New York City Bd. Of Educ., 777 F.Supp. 1113, 1116-17 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1099 , 111 S.Ct. 992 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1076 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
16 Employee Benefits Cas. 2671, Pens. Plan Guide P 23879d Tony D. Coleman, as Sole Heir and Beneficiary of the Estate of Charlie D. Coleman, Deceased, Cross-Appellee v. Champion International Corporation/champion Forest Products, Cross-Appellants
See, Keys v. Eastman Kodak Co., 739 F.Supp. 135 (W.D.N.Y.1990), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2nd Cir.1990) (holding son, not designated beneficiary by father, "stood no closer to beneficiary status than any other person"); Lerra v. Monsanto Co., 521 F.Supp. 1257, 1263 (D.Mass.1981) (surviving spouse lacked standing when held not to be beneficiary in absence of deceased's designation as such) 7 Appellant asserts that he is a "beneficiary" under Treasury Regulation 1.401-1, which states that the term "beneficiary" includes "the estate of the employee, dependents of the employee, persons who are the natu…
discussed
Cited "see"
Coleman Ex Rel. Estate of Coleman v. Champion International Corp.
See, Keys v. Eastman Kodak Co., 739 F.Supp. 135 (W.D.N.Y.1990), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2nd Cir.1990) (holding son, not designated beneficiary by father, "stood no closer to beneficiary status than any other person”); Lerra v. Monsanto Co., 521 F.Supp. 1257, 1263 (D.Mass.1981) (surviving spouse lacked standing when held not to be beneficiary in absence of deceased's designation as such). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Girl Scouts of the United States v. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
See U.S. Shoe Corp. v. Brown Group, Inc., 740 F.Supp. 196 , 199 n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without op., 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir.1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lloyd v. Crawford, III v. Jack A. Roane
See also Keys v. Eastman Kodak Co., 739 F.Supp. 135, 137-38 (W.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 923 F.2d 844 (2d Cir.1990); Lerra v. Monsanto Co., 521 F.Supp. 1257, 1263 (D.Mass.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Paulino
v.
Paulino
90-1127.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 19, 1990.
Published
U.S.
v.
Paulino
NOS. 90-1127, 90-1195
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
NOV 19, 1990
1
Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.