Newport v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, 106 F.3d 405 (8th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Newport v. U.S. Dept. of Labor, 106 F.3d 405 (8th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Euclid Market Inc. v. United States (ca8, 2023-02-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1997 2011 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Euclid Market Inc. v. United States
8th Cir. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haynes v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., Food & Nutrition Serv., 106 F.3d 405 (Table), 1997 WL 31600, at *1 (8th Cir. 1997) (unpublished per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Jefferson Smurfit v. United States
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See 106 F.3d 405 , 97-1 U.S. Tax Cas.
cited Cited "see" JEFFERSON SMURFIT CORPORATION, (U.S.) AND SUBSIDIARIES, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANT—APPELLANT
8th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See 106 F.3d 405 (8th Cir.1997) (per curiam) (8th Cir. R. 28A(i)).
cited Cited "see" Nestle Holdings, Inc. v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bradley v. United States, 106 F.3d 405 (8th Cir. 1997) , affg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Frederick Newport
v.
United States Department of Labor Robert Myer Lesley Elliott Ricardo Martinez Veterans Employment and Training Service Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs Solicitor of Labor Department of Justice U.S. Attorneys
95-2434.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Jan 27, 1997.
106 F.3d 405
Unpublished

106 F.3d 405

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that they are not precedent and generally should not be cited unless relevant to establishing the doctrines of res judicata, collateral estoppel, the law of the case, or if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue and no published opinion would serve as well.
James Frederick NEWPORT, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; Robert Myer; Lesley
Elliott; Ricardo Martinez; Veterans Employment and
Training Service; Office of Federal Contract Compliance
Programs; Solicitor of Labor; Department of Justice; U.S.
Attorneys, Appellees.

No. 95-2434WM

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 21, 1997.
Filed Jan. 27, 1997.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

James Frederick Newport appeals the district court's orders disposing of his Privacy Act and Freedom of Information Act claims, denying his motion to compel the United States Attorney General to appear as his counsel, and granting defendants' motion to stay discovery. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' submissions, we conclude Newport is not entitled to relief. We affirm the district court without further discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.