discussed Cited "see" Aspinwall v. Herrin In 1994, however, the Eleventh Circuit held in McKinney v. Pate that an allegation of wrongful termination in violation of a state-created property right in employment “implicates procedural — and not substantive — due process protection.” 20 F.3d 1550 , 1561 (11th Cir.1994), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. —, 115 S.Ct. 898 , 130 L.Ed.2d 783 (1994); see Tindal v. Montgomery Co. Commission, 32 F.3d 1535 (11th Cir.1994), reh’g denied, 42 F.3d 646 (11th Cir.1994).