Patricio B. Bautista v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 73 F.3d 379 (Fed. Cir. 1995). · Go Syfert
Search
Patricio B. Bautista v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 73 F.3d 379 (Fed. Cir. 1995). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“contractor is never assured that it will receive an award," so "the government retains discretion to reject all bids without liability . . . .”
71 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Irwin Holdings LLC v. Weigh to Wellness LLC (alnd, 2019-08-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1995 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1995 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Irwin Holdings LLC v. Weigh to Wellness LLC
N.D. Ala. · 2019 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
allegations in a trademark application of a date of use are not evidence of such use.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Zolon Pcs II, LLC v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2025 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
contractor is never assured that it will receive an award," so "the government retains discretion to reject all bids without liability . . . .
cited Cited "see" Smith v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Osborn v. United States, 47 Fed.Cl. 224, 232 (2000) (citing Blassingame v. United States, 33 Fed.Cl. 504, 505 , aff'd, 73 F.3d 379 (Fed.Cir.1995)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Patricio B. Bautista
v.
Merit Systems Protection Board
95-3671.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Dec 5, 1995.
73 F.3d 379
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 77%
Citer courts: Federal Claims (1)

73 F.3d 379
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.

Patricio B. BAUTISTA, Petitioner,
v.
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 95-3671.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 5, 1995.

ORDER

1

Petitioner having filed the required brief, it is

2

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the petition for review is REINSTATED.

3

Respondent should compute the due date for filing its brief from the date of this order.