Stenclik v. Comm'r, 498 U.S. 984 (1990). · Go Syfert
Stenclik v. Comm'r, 498 U.S. 984 (1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
142 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 38 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Weingarten v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST. (nysd, 2008-10-20) · Strongest negative: McFarlin v. District of Columbia (dc, 1996-08-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "but see" McFarlin v. District of Columbia
D.C. · 1996 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see also Young v. New York City Transit Auth., 903 F.2d 146 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) 8 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Weingarten v. BD. OF EDUC. OF CITY SCHOOL DIST.
S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · confidence medium
Auth., 903 F.2d 146, 161-62 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990). [41] Hotel Employees at 545. [42] Id. at 546. [43] Defs.' Br. at 19. [44] Klein Decl. ¶ 7. [45] Defs.'s Br. at 20.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Weingarten v. Board of Education
S.D.N.Y. · 2008 · confidence medium
Id. at 546. .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Comiskey v. Automotive Industry Action Group
E.D. Mich. · 1999 · confidence medium
Id. at 583.
discussed Cited "see" E.E.O.C. v. Spitzer Management, Inc.
N.D. Ohio · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) (outlining previous standard for prima facie Title VII retaliatory harassment case).
cited Cited "see" Willis v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.
S.D. Ohio · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); Skrjanc v. Great Lakes Power Serv.
cited Cited "see" Swanson v. Senior Resource Connection
S.D. Ohio · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
cited Cited "see" Harrison-Pepper v. Miami University
S.D. Ohio · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Judy G. Morris v. Oldham County Fiscal Court John W. Black, County Judge/executive Brent Likins
6th Cir. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) (outlining previous standard for prima facie Title VII retaliatory harassment case).
cited Cited "see" Shapira v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
E.D. Tenn. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
cited Cited "see" James R. Penny v. United Parcel Service
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Canitia v. Yellow Freight System, Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Branch v. Seibels (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
11th Cir. · 1994 · signal: accord · confidence high
Croson, 488 U.S. at 491-93 , 109 S.Ct. at 720-21 ; accord Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 908 F.2d 908, 916-17 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Ensley Branch, N.A.A.C.P. v. Seibels (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
11th Cir. · 1994 · signal: accord · confidence high
Croson, 488 U.S. at 501-02 , 109 S.Ct. at 725-26 ; accord Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 908 F.2d 908, 916-17 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 983 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
cited Cited "see" DeSantis v. United States
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stenclik v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 907 F.2d 25, 27 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see" O'Donnell Construction Co. v. District of Columbia
D.D.C. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cone Corp. v. Hillsborough County, 908 F.2d 908, 916 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) ("The Croson Court listed a 'whole array of race-neutral devices to increase the accessibility of city contracting opportunities to small entrepreneurs of all races,1 ... including simplified bidding procedures, relaxed bonding requirements, and training and financial aid.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joyce Workman, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Frito-Lay, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee (2×)
6th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harrison v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Tennessee
6th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
A prima facie retaliation claim is established by showing the following: “(1) that plaintiff engaged in an activity protected by Title VII; (2) that the exercise of his civil rights was known by the defendant; (3) that, thereafter, the defendant took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and (4) that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action.” Wrenn, 808 F.2d at 500 ; see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); compare Yates v…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Harrison v. Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson County
6th Cir. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
A prima facie retaliation claim is established by showing the following: "(1) that plaintiff engaged in an activity protected by Title VII; (2) that the exercise of his civil rights was known by the defendant; (3) that, thereafter, the defendant took an employment action adverse to the plaintiff; and (4) that there was a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action." Wrenn, 808 F.2d at 500 ; see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); compare Yates v. Av…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Newsom v. Textron Aerostructures
Tenn. Ct. App. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
April 8, 1993); see also Canitia v. Yellow Freight Sys., Inc., 903 F.2d 1064, 1066 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990) (holding that a plaintiff must prove these same four elements to establish a retaliatory discharge in violation of Title VII). 12 Once a plaintiff establishes a prima facie ease of retaliation, the burden of production shifts to the defendant to “articulate some legitimate, non discriminatory reason ...” for discharging the plaintiff.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Brown v. Giuliani
E.D.N.Y · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
Eng, 849 F.2d at 82 ; see also Young v. New York City Transit Authority, 729 F.Supp. 341, 348 (S.D.N.Y.), rev’d on other grounds, 903 F.2d 146 (2d Cir), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 984 , 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Loper v. New York City Police Department (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Kelling Aff.; see also Young v. New York City Transit Authority, 903 F.2d 146 , 149-50 (2d Cir.) (discussing the exigencies created by begging), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 516 , 112 L.Ed.2d 528 (1990); Kelling, Measuring What Matters: A New Way of Thinking About Crime and Public Order, 2 City J. 21, 24-25 (Spring 1992) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stenclik et ux.
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 90-592.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1990.
498 U.S. 984
Published

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.