green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dennis William Blackstone
See United States v. McCollum, 732 F.2d 1419, 1426 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 301 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984); United States v. Gaertner, 705 F.2d 210, 217 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1071 , 104 S.Ct. 979 , 79 L.Ed.2d 216 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Olivera Rivera, United States of America v. Alfonso Rivera-Farias, United States of America v. Maria Diaz, United States of America v. Francisca Lara, United States of America v. Rosendo Cisneros
See Bruno v. Rushen, 721 F.2d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Earl Benard Crawford
See United States v. McFadden, 739 F.2d 149, 152 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984) (defendants’ conduct was a substantial step when they planned a bank robbery, surveyed the bank assembled the necessary weapons and disguises, and drove to the area of the bank in the getaway vehicle).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael A. Griley, Jr.
See United States v. McFadden, 739 F.2d 149, 153 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carl Emmitt Prichard
See United States v. McFadden, 739 F.2d 149, 152 (4th Cir.) (discussion of plans, reconnoitering of bank, assemblage of weapons and disguises, and presence at bank supports attempt conviction), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984); United States v. Snell, 627 F.2d 186, 188 (9th Cir.1980) (assemblage and possession of materials for use in robbery, reconnoitering of bank and bank manager’s routine, and presence at bank manager’s home supports attempt conviction).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harries v. State
See also State v. Campbell, 664 S.W.2d 281, 284 (Tenn. 1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Harries v. State
See also State v. Campbell, 664 S.W.2d 281, 284 (Tenn.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Neal, Iii, A/K/A Sonny
See Model Penal Code § 5.01(l)(c) (Proposed Official Draft 1985); see also United States v. McFadden, 739 F.2d 149, 152 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Id. at 615; see also Bruno v. Rushen, 721 F.2d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carroll v. State
See also Bruno v. Rushen, 721 F.2d 1193, 1194-95 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984); Arthur v. State, 575 So.2d 1165, 1185-86 (Ala.Cr.App. 1990), cert. denied, 575 So.2d 1191 (Ala. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Susana Sanchez-Robles
Compare Donnelly v. DeChristoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 645 , 94 S.Ct. 1868 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431, 438 (1974) (one instance of misconduct in extended trial does not render entire trial fundamentally unfair) with Bruno v. Rushen, 721 F.2d 1193, 1194-95 (9th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (infringement of right to counsel where prosecutor labels lawyer’s actions “unethical and perhaps even illegal” without any supporting evidence), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984), and United States v. McDonald, 620 F.2d 559, 563-64 (5th Cir.1980) (infringement of right to counsel where prose…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mainland Industries, Inc. v. Standal's Patents Ltd., and Roderick E. MacDonald as of the Estate of George M. Standal
See also United States v. McCollum, 732 F.2d 1419 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 920 , 105 S.Ct. 301 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984) (not an abuse of discretion to admit portions of videotaped hypnosis session for purposes of demonstrating basis for hypnotist’s opinion and excluding portion in which party recited his “enhanced memory” version of facts); see generally Durflinger v. Artiles, 727 F.2d 888 (10th Cir.1984) (in civil wrongful death action, not an abuse of discretion to admit videotaped confession of murder by the accused); compare Foster v. Crawford Shipping Co., Ltd., 496 F.2d 78…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick Kirkpatrick, Etc. v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondents
(3×)
See also Bruno v. Rushen, 721 F.2d 1193, 1195 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 302 , 83 L.Ed.2d 236 (1984) 41 The federal district judge cited Fulford v. Maggio, 692 F.2d 354, 359 (5th Cir.1982), rev'd on other grounds, 462 U.S. 111 , 103 S.Ct. 2261 , 76 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983) 42 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) 43 Id. at ----, 104 S.Ct. at 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d at 692 44 Id. at ----, 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70, 80 L.Ed.2d at 699 ; Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372, 1392 (5th Cir.1984) 45 466 U.S. at ----, 104 S.Ct. at 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d at 692 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCollum
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-5413.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.