green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
15.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1995 ·
…he party who sues the united states bears the burden of pointing to ... an unequivocal waiver of immunity
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…section 1962(c) nowhere requires proof regarding the advancement of the enterprise's affairs by the defendant's activities or proof that the enterprise itself is corrupt....
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1994 ·
…section 1962(c) nowhere requires proof regarding the advancement of the enterprise's affairs by the defendant's activities or proof that the enterprise itself is corrupt_
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Protter v. Nathan's Famous Systems, Inc.
(2×)
under 1962(b), a plaintiff must allege a specific nexus between control of a named enterprise and the alleged racketeering activity
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goewey v. United States
(2×)
he party who sues the united states bears the burden of pointing to ... an unequivocal waiver of immunity
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Arsenal Auto Repairs, Inc., Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. Rodco Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis, Aetna Casualty Surety Company v. P & B Autobody, Betty Arhaggelidis
(2×)
section 1962(c) nowhere requires proof regarding the advancement of the enterprise's affairs by the defendant's activities or proof that the enterprise itself is corrupt....
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Aetna Casualty Surety Co. v. P & B Autobody
(2×)
section 1962(c) nowhere requires proof regarding the advancement of the enterprise's affairs by the defendant's activities or proof that the enterprise itself is corrupt_
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Fadi Chahine
where a party fails to object at trial, reversal is required only in those exceptional circumstances where necessary to avoid a miscarriage of justice.
discussed
Cited "see"
Altimonte v. Leboz
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. MEMORANDUM v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1410 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. 19 Thames Street Partnership
See Friezo v. Friezo, 281 Conn. 166, 180 , 914 A.2d 533 (2007). “[I]t is a fundamental principle of corporate law that ‘the parent corporation and its subsidiary are treated as separate and distinct legal persons even though the parent owns all the shares in the subsidiary and the two enterprises have identical directors and officers.’ ” SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Bannon, 217 Conn. 220, 232 , 585 A.2d 666 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1223 , 111 S. Ct. 2839 , 115 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Riley v. Delaware River and Bay Authority
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991). *509 IV.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lumpkins v. United States
(2×)
See Williams v. United States, 50 F.3d 299, 304 (4th Cir.1995) (citing Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991)); see also McKeel v. United States, 178 F.Supp.2d 493, 496 (D.Md.2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Garcia v. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lumpkins v. United States
(2×)
See Williams v. United States, 50 F.3d 299, 304 (4th Cir.1995) (citing Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3rd Cm.), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991)); see also McKeel v. United States, 178 F.Supp.2d 493, 497 (D.Md.2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowers v. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASS'N, ACT
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bowers v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vorhees v. Time Warner Cable National Division
(2×)
See Kehr Packages v. Fidelcor, 926 F.2d 1406 , 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Poling v. K. Hovnanian Enterprises
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Pidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1411-1412 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. American Legion Cortland City Post 489
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Atwood
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991) (citing Bell v. Hood, 327 U.S. 678, 682 , 66 S.Ct. 773 , 90 L.Ed. 939 (1946)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cohen v. Kurtzman
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Boyle, 925 F.2d at 74-75 ; Martinez, 875 F.Supp. at 1070 ; Biase, 852 F.Supp. at 276 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas v. Ross & Hardies
(2×)
See Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639, 883 F.2d 132, 140 (D.C.Cir.1989), rev’d in part on other grounds, 913 F.2d 948 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lujan v. Mansmann
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1410 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Griffith, Strickler, Lerman, Solymos & Calkins v. Taylor (In Re Taylor)
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1410 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Sckrob v. Catterson, 948 F.2d 1402, 1405 (3d Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Valentine
(2×)
See Zands v. Nelson, 779 F.Supp. at 1258 , citing [cf.] Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409-10 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Henry Mowry Mike
(4×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 , 1417 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 , 1417 n.4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S. Ct. 2839 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vemco, Inc. v. John Camardella
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1418 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Feinstein v. RTC, 942 F.2d 34, 36 (1st Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Temple
See United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 637 (6th Cir.1990) ("All of the attendant circumstances do not raise an inference that the prosecutor excluded Blacks from the jury on account of their race."), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Killian v. McCulloch
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, 926 F.2d 1406 , 1408 (3rd Cir.1991), cert, denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richland-Lexington Airport District v. Atlas Properties, Inc.
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1408 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vidovic v. Losinjska Plovidba Oour Broadarstvo
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
examined
Cited "see"
Rolo v. City Investing Co.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lampf, 501 U.S. at-, 111 S.Ct. at 2782 (the “3-year limit is a period of repose inconsistent with tolling”); Cohen v. McAllister, 688 F.Supp. 1040, 1045 (W.D.Pa.1988) (the plain language of Data Access requires a finding that the three-year limitations period is absolute); Mekhjian v. Wollin, 782 F.Supp. 881, 885 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (same); Short v. Belleville Shoe Mfg.
examined
Cited "see"
Confederate Memorial Association, Inc. John Edward Hurley and Mrs. John Tilden Rogers v. Richard T. Hines
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 689, 839 F.2d 782, 790 (D.C.Cir.1988) (holding that “one entity may not serve as the enterprise and the person associated with it”), vacated in part on other grounds, 913 F.2d 948 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Farmer
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1417-18 (3d Cir), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991). 20 The DOA Defendants argue that there were several “victims” that fell prey to the third-party defendants’ alleged fraudulent conduct.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilmore v. Berg
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 , 1411 n. 1 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Schwartz v. Philadelphia Nat’l Bank, 701 F.Supp. 92, 96 (E.D.Pa.1988), aff'd, 879 F.2d 859 (3d Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edison Electric Institute v. Henwood
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidel-cor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991). ' Moreover, plaintiffs allegations satisfy the open-ended test for continuity.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeffrey August
See United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 638 (6th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Federal Communications Commission
(2×)
See Warner Cable Communications v. City of Niceville, 911 F.2d 634 (11th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Elliott v. ITT Corp.
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1415 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Heritage Travel, Inc., 904 F.2d 786, 791 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 992 , 111 S.Ct. 536 , 112 L.Ed.2d 546 (1990); United States v. Cronic, 900 F.2d 1511, 1513-1514 (10th Cir.1990); Armco Industrial Credit Corp. v. SLT Warehouse Co., 782 F.2d 475, 481-482 (5th Cir.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Dennis P. Glick v. Department of the Army
See Yellow Bus Lines v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639, 913 F.2d 948 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
John Prayso v. United States
See United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 643 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony Dicarlantonio v. United States
See United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 643 (6th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991). 5 Accordingly, all pending motions are denied, and the district court's order is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Growth Horizons, Inc. v. Delaware County, Pa.
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Mortensen v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gallagher v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Mortensen v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Heller v. CACL Federal Credit Union
(2×)
See Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991); Mortensen v. First Federal Savings and Loan Ass’n, 549 F.2d 884, 891 (3d Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raleigh Mitchell Walton
See United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 640 (6th Cir.1990) (witnesses are not permitted to testify about the law because the judge's special legal knowledge is presumed sufficient), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2839 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Young & Co. v. Bob Reves Robert H. Gibbs & Frances Graham, Thomas E. Robertson, Jr., as Trustee of the Farmer's Co-Op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as Representative of a Class of Members, Depositors, and Equity Security Holders, Who Are Similarly Situated to Him Bob Reves Frances Graham Robert H. Gibbs, Individually Robert H. Gibbs, as Natural Guardian of His Minor Children, Thomas A. Gibbs and Robert H. Gibbs, Jr. And Robert H. Gibbs, as Trustee of the Muskogee Internal Medicine Group Profit Sharing Funds v. Arthur Young & Co., Thomas E. Robertson, Jr., as Trustee of the Farmer's Co-Op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as Representative of a Class of Members, Depositors, and Equity Security Holders, Who Are Similarly Situated to Him v. Arthur Young & Co., Thomas E. Robertson, Jr., Etc. v. Jack White Thomas E. Robertson, Jr., as Trustee of the Farmer's Co-Op of Arkansas and Oklahoma, Inc., and as Representative of a Class of Members, Depositors, and Equity Security Holders, Who Are Similarly Situated to Him Bob Reves Frances Graham Robert H. Gibbs, Individually Robert H. Gibbs, as Natural Guardian of His Minor Children, Thomas A. Gibbs and Robert H. Gibbs, Jr. And Robert H. Gibbs, as Trustee of the Muskogee Internal Medicine Group Profit Sharing Funds v. Arthur Young & Co., Thomas E. Robertson, Jr., Etc. v. Jack White Robert R. Cloar, Class Counsel v. Bob Reves
(2×)
See Yellow Bus Lines v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639, 913 F.2d 948 , 952-55 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc) (reviewing the varied approaches to the participation requirement taken by the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits and adopting the Eighth Circuit's standard), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lloyd T. Danielsen v. Burnside-Ott Aviation Training Center, Inc.
(2×)
See Yellow Bus Lines, Inc. v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639, 913 F.2d 948, 950 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Arthur Young & Co. v. Reves
(2×)
See Yellow Bus Lines v. Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639, 913 F.2d 948 , 952-55 (D.C.Cir.1990) (en banc) (reviewing the varied approaches to the participation requirement taken by the Second, Fourth, Fifth, Seventh, Eighth and Eleventh Circuits and adopting the Eighth Circuit’s standard), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Wallingford v. Department of Public Health
Compare Hartford Steam, Service Co. v. Sullivan, 26 Conn. Sup. 277, 281 , 220 A.2d 772 (1966) (upholding imposition of gross earnings tax on corporate parent because “where the economic enterprise is one, the corporate forms being largely paper arrangements that do not reflect the business realities, the court should deal with the realities”), with SFA Folio Collections, Inc. v. Bannon, 217 Conn. 220, 235 , 585 A.2d 666 , cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1223 , 111 S. Ct. 2839 , 115 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kinsey v. Kinsey
(2×)
Corp., 78 F.3d 1125, 1134 (6th Cir.1996); See also, Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tiemann v. U.S. Healthcare Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Cohen v. Kurtzman, 45 F.Supp.2d 423, 429 (D.N.J. 1999) (citing Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc., 926 F.2d 1406, 1409 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1222 , 111 S.Ct. 2839 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1007 (1991)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yellow Bus Lines, Inc.
v.
Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639
v.
Drivers, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union 639
No. 90-872.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1991.
Cited by 187 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice White would grant certiorari.