Barnes v. Lacy, 502 U.S. 938 (1991). · Go Syfert
Barnes v. Lacy, 502 U.S. 938 (1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
79 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Harry J. Reese (ca2, 1994-08-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harry J. Reese
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991); United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1187 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 1081 , 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Victor J. Orena, Also Known as Little Vic
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1303-04 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991); Mendel, 746 F.2d at 167 .
cited Cited "see" United States v. Juan Fermin, Hector Fermin, and Freddy Fermin
2d Cir. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1299 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Angelina Didomenico (2×)
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
A district court may admit the testimony of a qualified expert if his knowledge “will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Fed.R.Evid. 702 (rev. ed. 1991); see United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1304 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Franklin Almonte
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1303 (2d Cir.) (“[W]e review rulings as to authentication for abuse of the district court’s ‘broad discretion.’ ”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." CONGELOSI v. Miller
W.D.N.Y. · 2009 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sanchez v. Duncan, 282 F.3d 78 , 83 fn. 4 (2d Cir.2002) (declining to decide whether there is a “clearly established” federal right to be present at voir dire side bar conferences); see also Zaire v. Mitchell, No. 93 Civ. 6626(JG), 1996 WL 82391 , at *3 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (“There is not now, and there never has been, a right guaranteed under the Federal Constitution that a State or Federal defendant be present at a sidebar voir dire of a prospective juror.”) (citing, inter alia, United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1301 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 938 , 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Eret v. Continental Holding, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Discussing a fact pattern similar to this case, the Sixth Circuit has held that the “separation from one employer followed by immediate employment with a successor employer” because of the Sale of a plant is not a layoff.' Rowe v. Allied Chemical Hourly Employees’ Pension Plan, 915 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990); see also Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090, 1093-95 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991); Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, 970 F.2d 1165, 1176-77 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." O'Connell v. Continental Can Co. Inc.
7th Cir. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
The "separation from one employer followed by immediate employment with a successor employer" because of the sale of a plant "does not constitute a layoff." Rowe v. Allied Chemical Hourly Employees' Pension Plan, 915 F.2d 266, 269 (6th Cir.1990); see also Blank v. Bethelehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090 , 1093-96 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 372 (1991); Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees, 970 F.2d 1165, 1176 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 657 (1992); cf. Fought v. Evans Products Co. Racine Pension Plan Agreement, 966 F.2d 304, 307 (7th Cir.19…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Millan
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. (quoting United States v. Knohl, 379 F.2d 427, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 973 , 88 S.Ct. 472 , 19 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1303 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Gotti v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mellan
S.D.N.Y. · 1993 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. (quoting United States v. Knohl, 379 F.2d 427, 440 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 973 , 88 S.Ct. 472 , 19 L.Ed.2d 465 (1967)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 928 F.2d 1289, 1303 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Gotti v. United States, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Edwin Kotrosits v. Gatx Corporation Non-Contributory Pension Plan For Salaried Employees
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090, 1092 (11th Cir.1991) (upholding administrator's decision that early retirement benefits triggered by "layoff or disability" were not available where claimants continued in same job with successor employer), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991); Rowe v. Allied Chem.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Kotrosits v. GATX Corp. Non-Contributory Pension Plan for Salaried Employees
3rd Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090, 1092 (11th Cir.1991) (upholding administrator’s decision that early retirement benefits triggered by “layoff or disability” were not available where claimants continued in same job with successor employer), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 372 , 116 L.Ed.2d 324 (1991); Rowe v. Allied Chem.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Matala v. Board of Regents of the University
N.Y. App. Div. · 1992 · signal: see also · confidence low
Moreover, the well-settled principle that the Board of Regents’ determination regarding witness credibility will not be disturbed unless it is irrational is especially important in this case, which turns on the testimony of four witnesses: (1) patient A, (2) the State’s expert, Fred Storm, the medical director of Upper Hudson Planned Parenthood in Albany, (3) petitioner, and (4) petitioner’s expert, William Dillon, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the State University of New York at Buffalo (see, Matter of Goomar v Ambach, 136 AD2d 774, 777 , appeal dismissed 72 NY2…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Barnes
v.
Lacy
No. 91-244.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 1991.
502 U.S. 938
Published

C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.