green
Positive treatment
9.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles McNelton v. William Gittere (DEATH PENALTY)
See United States v. Lopez–Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 , 595– 96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992) 20 (prosecutor may comment on defense's failure to present exculpatory evidence, as long as that comment is not phrased to call attention to defendant's failure to 21 testify).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frierson v. Calderon
An evidentiary ruling constitutes a due process violation if “[t]he excluded testimony was highly relevant to a critical issue in the punishment phase of the trial, and substantial reasons existed to assume its reliability.” Green, 442 U.S. at 97 , 99 S.Ct. at 2151 (internal citations omitted) (emphasis added); accord United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 588 (9th Cir.1992) (exclusion of evidence pursuant to the valid application of the hearsay rules may violate due process if the evidence excluded is “sufficiently reliable and crucial to the defense”), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 9…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sayetsitty
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
46 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 760, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1477, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 2213 United States of America v. Larry Sayetsitty, United States of America v. Joe Sayetsitty
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
Robert TURNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles D. MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 596 (9th Cir.), cert. denied , — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992); United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1083 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
McNelton v. State
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 595-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S. Ct. 504 (1992) (prosecutor may comment on defense’s failure to present exculpatory evidence, as long as that comment is not phrased to call attention to defend ant’s failure to testify).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ponce
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 595-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos Tapia Ponce, AKA Carlos Perez, Ricardo Lopez Mateos, United States of America v. James Romero McTague United States of America v. Hector Tapia Anchondo, United States of America v. Hugo Fernando Castillon-Alvarez, AKA Hugo Fernando Castillon, United States of America v. Mauricio Monroy
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 595-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Noe Barajas Baltazar
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 593 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Gable, Jr., United States of America v. Mary Ann Funderburk, United States of America v. John G. Thomas
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 597 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992); United States v. Sehnal, 930 F.2d 1420, 1427 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 300 (1991). 20 Here, Funderburk submitted supplemental jury instructions relating to: 1) the "willfulness" requirement of acts relative to aiding and abetting; 2) the "mere presence" defense; 3) the definition of an agreement as opposed to a mere association; 4) the "knowledge" requirement relative to membership in a conspiracy and the meeting of minds requirement for an agreement; and 5) the legal versus illegal …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dionisio Vasquez, United States of America v. Nicolas Saltaris, United States of America v. Jose Gonzalez-Perez
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See id. at 596.
discussed
Cited "see"
Larry D. Hines v. Robert G. Borg, Warden
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 595-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992); United States v. Castillo, 866 F.2d 1071, 1083 (9th Cir.1988). 22 Hines contends that because the information charged only a violation of Cal.Penal Code Sec. 187, the prosecutor's arguments concerning felony murder were impermissible.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Javier Vasquez-Velasco
(2×)
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 586, 596 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rance Dwayne Preston
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 597-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992); United States v. Apodaca, 666 F.2d 89, 96-97 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 823 , 103 S.Ct. 53 , 74 L.Ed.2d 58 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Djinn Farrar, United States of America v. Oin Glenn Grove
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 589-93 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rosa Olivera Rivera, United States of America v. Alfonso Rivera-Farias, United States of America v. Maria Diaz, United States of America v. Francisca Lara, United States of America v. Rosendo Cisneros
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 597-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ositadima Igbo, and Phillip Chukwurah
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 598 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stewart Gia
See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dow
See, e.g., United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 989 , 113 S.Ct. 504 , 121 L.Ed.2d 440 (1992). *1281 ¶ 13 Here, the Court of Appeals engaged in similar analysis, recognizing that the corroboration requirement of the rule is rooted in traditional notions of justice and has become a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice and concluding that the Washington corpus delicti rule and its federal counterpart were not constitutionally mandated.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dow
Corbett, 106 Wash.2d at 576 , 723 P.2d 1135 (emphasis added); see also C.D.W., 76 Wash.App. at 763 , 887 P.2d 911 . ¶ 13 Although these cases support the State's assertion that Washington's version of the corpus delicti rule is not a constitutional standard, they do not address whether the federal version of the corpus delicti rule is a constitutional standard. [7] To determine that issue, we must examine whether the corroboration rule discussed in Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583 , cert. denied, 506 U.S. 98…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ira Vincent Spearman
See also United States. v. Perez, 67 F.3d 1371, 1379-1380 (9th Cir.1995), rehearing en banc granted, 77 F.3d 1210 (1996), where this Court rejected an argument very similar to that raised by Spearman. 20 While a defendant is generally entitled to have the judge instruct the jury on his theory of defense, a "defendant is not entitled to any particular form of instruction, nor is he entitled to an instruction that merely duplicates what the jury has already been told," U.S. v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 597 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wayne Head
See also United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 504 (1992). 16 Appellant's cross-examination of Donovan Lowe revealed that Lowe's wife had filed a lawsuit against Head concerning the house she had purchased from him.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garibay-Bravo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 92-6201.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 16, 1992.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.