green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case ·
“Dialectical perfection, metaphysical nicety, abstract inerrancy, are not expected or required of Federal trial courts.”
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
David R. Ruiz, United States of America, Intervenor-Appellee v. W. J. Estelle, Jr.
dialectical perfection, metaphysical nicety, abstract inerrancy, are not expected or required of federal trial courts.
cited
Cited "see"
TWE Retirement Fund Trust v. Ream
See Porter v. Porter, 101 Ariz. 131, 138 , 416 P.2d 564, 571 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 1028 , 18 L.Ed.2d 107 (1967); Snow v. Kennedy, 36 Ariz. 475, 486 , 286 P. 930, 934 (1930).
cited
Cited "see"
Pye v. Teamsters
See National Maritime Union of Am. v. NLRB, 367 F.2d 171, 176 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Pye v. Teamsters
See National ___ ________ Maritime Union of Am. v. NLRB, 367 F.2d 171, 176 (8th Cir. 1966), _____________________ ____ cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Rosemary Pye, Regional Director, Etc. v. Teamsters Local Union No. 122
See National Maritime Union of Am. v. NLRB, 367 F.2d 171, 176 (8th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Churchill v. F/V Fjord
See Crane v. Gas Screw Happy Pappy, 367 F.2d 771, 773-74 (7th Cir.1966), cert. denied, Borrowdale v. Reuland, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1029 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Reed v. S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
McLINN v. FJORD
See Crane v. Gas Screw Happy Pappy, 367 F.2d 771, 773-74 (7th Cir.1966), cert. denied, Borrowdale v. Reuland, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1029 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Reed v. S.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Lajuan and Billy Wood v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
See Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); 19 C.
cited
Cited "see"
Still v. Hudson (In Re Hudson)
See Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Mooreman, 366 F.2d 686, 688 (9th Cir.1966) cert. den. 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 109 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. West Peachtree Tenth Corporation D/B/A One Tenth Street Apartments
(2×)
R.Civ.P.; see Bryan v. Kershaw, 5 Cir. 1966, 366 F.2d 497, 499 , cert. denied, 1967, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kram v. Kram
See Porter v. Porter, 101 Ariz. 131 , 416 P. 2d 564 (Sup. Ct. 1966) certiorari denied 386 U. S. 957 , 87 S. Ct. 1028 , 18 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thoma v. Thoma
Some state courts have endorsed such an exception to the “last in time” rule, reasoning that otherwise they would be giving “ ‘greater faith and credit to the judgments of the courts of other states’ than to their own judgments.” Medveskas v. Karparis, 161 Vt. 387 , 640 A.2d 543, 546 (1994) (quoting Hammell v. Britton, 19 Cal.2d 72 , 119 P.2d 333, 339 (1941) (en banc)); see also Porter v. Porter, 101 Ariz. 131, 135 , 416 P.2d 564, 568 (1966) (en banc), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 957 , 87 S.Ct. 1028 , 18 L.Ed.2d 107 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
See, e.g., Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Smith v. Dravo Corp., 203 F.2d 369, 374-75 (7th Cir.1953); Imi-Tech Corp. v. Gagliani, 691 F.Supp. 214, 231 (S.D.Cal.1986); Syntex Opthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky, 214 U.S.P.Q. 272 , 277, 1982 WL 63797 (N.D.Ill.1982) ("[w]here the security lapses were not the cause of the misappropriation, those lapses should not be the basis for denying protection"), aff'd, 701 F.2d 677 (7th Cir.1983); Courture, "Independent Derivation and Reverse Engineering," at 623 (citing cases…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
See, e.g., Bryan v. Kershaw, 366 F.2d 497, 500-01 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 959 , 87 S.Ct. 1030 , 18 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967); Smith v. Dravo Corp., 203 F.2d 369, 374-75 (7th Cir.1953); Imi-Tech Corp. v. Gagliani, 691 F.Supp. 214, 231 (S.D.Cal.1986); Syntex Opthalmics, Inc. v. Novicky, 214 U.S.P.Q. 272 , 277, 1982 WL 63797 (N.D.Ill.1982) (“[w]here the security lapses were not the cause of the misappropriation, those lapses should not be the basis for denying protection”), aff 'd, 701 F.2d 677 (7th Cir.1983); Courture, “Independent Derivation and Re-. verse Engineering,” at 623 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estate of Schildkraut
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
No. 991.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 13, 1967.
George C. Wildermuth for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall] Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Harry Baum for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.