Williams v. United States, 355 U.S. 953 (1958). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. United States, 355 U.S. 953 (1958). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events across 15 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of America (ca2, 1995-10-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958 1992 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of America
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. United States, 248 F.2d 492, 494-95 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 953 , 78 S.Ct. 537 , 2 L.Ed.2d 529 (1958); United States v. Johnson, 181 F.2d 577, 580-81 (9th Cir.1950) (“California decisions with respect to the tests for determining when the servant of a private employer is acting within the course of his employment supply a convenient starting point for a discussion”).
discussed Cited "see" Scott A. Taber v. Robert S. Maine, and United States of America (2×)
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. United States, 248 F.2d 492, 494-95 (9th Cir.1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 953 , 78 S.Ct. 537 , 2 L.Ed.2d 529 (1958); United States v. Johnson, 181 F.2d 577, 580-81 (9th Cir.1950) ("California decisions with respect to the tests for determining when the servant of a private employer is acting within the course of his employment supply a convenient starting point for a discussion"). 15 Nevertheless, we begin with Guam.
cited Cited "see" Winder Aircraft Corp. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bolinders Company, Inc. v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 677 , 153 F. Supp. 381 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 953 (1958).
cited Cited "see" Winder Aircraft Corporation of Florida and the Seminole Bank of Tampa, Tampa, Florida v. The United States
Ct. Cl. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bolinders Company, Inc. v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 381 , 139 Ct.Cl. 677 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 953 , 78 S.Ct. 538 , 2 L.Ed.2d 530 (1958).
discussed Cited "see" Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United States (2×)
Ct. Cl. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bolinders Company, Inc. v. United States, 153 F. Supp. 381 , 139 Ct.Cl. 677 (1957), cert. den. 355 U.S. 953 , 78 S.Ct. 538 , 2 L.Ed. 2d 530 (1958) where the court said at 153 F.Supp. 383 -384, 139 Ct.Cl. 681 : 55 Except for the First War Powers Act, supra, plaintiff would of course have no basis whatever for asking an increase in the contract price, and the First War Powers Act was not passed for the benefit of contractors or for their relief from an unprofitable contract, but solely for the benefit of the nation as a whole, in order to facilitate the prosecution of the war.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Davison Fuel and Dock Company, a Corporation
4th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Ruth Elkhorn Coals, Inc. v. Mitchell, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 313 , 248 F.2d 635 (1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 953 , 78 S.Ct. 539 , 2 L.Ed.2d 530 (1958); Mitchell v. Covington Mills, Inc., 229 F.2d 506 (D.C.Cir.1955), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 1002 , 76 S.Ct. 546 , 100 L.Ed. 865 (1956).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
No. 685.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1958.
355 U.S. 953
Henry C. Clausen for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Morton Hollander for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.