green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Labansky v. Labansky
See State v. Herring, 77 N.M. 232 , 421 P.2d 767 (1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2126 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1372 (1967); State v. Duran, 105 N.M. 231 , 731 P.2d 374 (Ct.App. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Heckman
Accord United States v. Hensley, 374 F.2d 341 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2139 , 18 L.Ed. 1373 (1967); United States v. Cianchetti, 315 F.2d 584 (2d Cir. 1963); see United States v. Franklin, 429 F.2d 274 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 967 , 91 S.Ct. 380 , 27 L.Ed. 387 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Heckman
Vito filed a separate brief and argues not that the government failed to prove the existence of a criminal conspiracy, but that the evidence was insufficient to show his connection to any conspiracy that may have existed 4 See Developments in the Law-Criminal Conspiracy, 72 Harv.L.Rev. 920, 957-60 (1959) 5 United States v. Borelli, 336 F.2d 376, 388 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 960 , 85 S.Ct. 647 , 13 L.Ed.2d 555 (1965), quoting Hyde v. United States, 225 U.S. 347 , 369, 32 S.Ct. 793 , 56 L.Ed. 1114 (1912) 6 United States v. DeCavalcante, 440 F.2d 1264 , 1273 (3d Cir. 1971); United S…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Ellsworth Thomas
See United States v. Hensley, 374 F.2d 341 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2139 , 18 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Robert Camacho v. United States
Rule 5, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; See, United States v. Hensley, 374 F.2d 341 (6th Cir., 1967), cert. den. 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2139 , 18 L.Ed. 2d 1373 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dugas
See Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719 , 86 S.Ct. 1772 , 16 L.Ed.2d 882 and State v. Johnson, 249 La. 950 , 192 So.2d 135 , cert, denied 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2144 , 18 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parkhurst v. State
(2×)
See e. g., United States v. Hensley, 374 F.2d 341 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 388 U.S. 923 , 87 S.Ct. 2139 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1373 , reh. denied 389 U.S. 891 , 88 S.Ct. 25 , 19 L.Ed.2d 210 , (arrest occurred when detectives ordered suspect out of his car and into their car at gunpoint; court found probable cause in connection with immediately preceding attempted bombing); United States v. Lampkin, 464 F.2d 1093 (3rd Cir. 1972) (arrest when officers approached with guns drawn and asked for identification; outstanding warrant for subject’s arrest).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hatch
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 1219.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 12, 1967.
388 U.S. 923
Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 4th Jud. Dept.