green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Philip Morris
HOVENKAMP, supra, ¶ 2311b; see Purolator Prods., Inc. v. FTC, 352 F.2d 874, 883 (7th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 758 , 19 L.Ed.2d 837 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Philip Morris Inc.
(2×)
HOVENKAMP, independent jobber (Barnosky), who claimed that the supra, ¶ 2311b; see Purolator Prods., Inc. v. FTC, 352 F.2d supplier’s (Union Oil) sales to its own branded retail outlets 874, 883 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 (1968). at a lower price than Barnosky could afford to charge to its In the usual § 2(a) claim, the complained-of price retail customers violated § 2(a).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968) (ASCAP, common agent for over 8,000 musicians, held not to be an agreement in restraint of trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968) (ASCAP, common agent for over 8,000 musicians, held not to be an agreement in restraint of trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Glueck v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.
See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Walker, 382 F.2d 548 (7th Cir. 1967) (law firm obtaining admission from insured in the course of representing insurer against third-party claim should withdraw from further representation in lawsuit between insurer and insured), ce rt. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 789 , 19 L.Ed.2d 837 (1968); see generally Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 580 F.2d 1311, 1318-20 (7th Cir.) (discussing ethical obligations of a law firm in the absence of “express attorney-client relationship”), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 955 , 99 S.Ct. 353 , 58…
cited
Cited "see"
Opinion No.
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967) cert. denied6 389 U.S. 1045 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wales Home Remodeling Co., Inc. v. Alside Aluminum Corp.
See Purolator Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 352 F.2d 874, 883 (7th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 758 , 19 L.Ed.2d 837 (1968); Federal Trade Commission v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 390 U.S. 341 , 88 S.Ct. 904 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1222 (1968), on which plaintiff relies, concerns 15 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Tempo Music, Inc., Robbins Music Corporation, Remick Music Corporation, and Mills Music, Inc. v. James D. Myers
See K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers
See also ASCAP v. Showtime/The Movie Channel, Inc., 912 F.2d at 570 (noting that “context” of 1950 Decree reflects intent to “disinfect” ASCAP “as a potential combination in restraint of trade____”) (quoting K-91, Inc. v. Gershwin Publishing Corp., 372 F.2d 1, 4 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 761 , 19 L.Ed.2d 838 (1968)); cf. United States v. County of Nassau, 907 F.2d 397 (2d Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (affirming refusal to modify decree, in part based on conclusion that change “would undermine the purpose of the decree”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Boise Cascade Corporation v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See, e.g., Purolator Products, Inc. v. FTC, 352 F.2d 874, 882 (7th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 758 , 19 L.Ed.2d 857 (1968) (even discounts that do no more than compensate an integrated competitor for the cost of its integration are proscribed; “some WDs [warehouse distributors] have costs peculiar to their manner of doing business[, which] does not show ... that competitors of these WDs would not be injured if some of those costs are paid by” the manufacturer).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rose Confections, Inc. v. Ambrosia Chocolate Company, a Division of W.R. Grace and Co.
See, e.g., Purolator Products, Inc., 65 F.T.C. 8 (1964), aff'd, 352 F.2d 874 (7th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1045 , 88 S.Ct. 758 , 19 L.Ed.2d 837 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
E. W. Buschman Co.
v.
National Labor Relations Board
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 865.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1968.
389 U.S. 1045
Edward Statland for petitioner., Solicitor General Gris-wold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.