green
Positive treatment
4.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Moreland v. Bradshaw
See State v. Hymore (1967) 9 Ohio St.2d 122, 128 , 38 O.O.2d 298, 302 , 224 N.E.2d 126, 130 , certiorari denied (1968) 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1409 , 20 L.Ed.2d 281 . “[Tjhe term ‘[ajbuse of discretion’ connotes more than an error of law or of judgment; it implies that the court’s attitude is unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable * * (Citations omitted.) State v. Adams (1980), 62 Ohio St.2d 151, 157 , 16 O.O.3d 169, 173 , 404 N.E.2d 144, 149 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Morrison, Unpublished Decision (12-31-2001)
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122 , 128 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 ("The trial court has broad discretion in the admission and exclusion of evidence and unless it has clearly abused its discretion and the defendant has been materially prejudiced thereby, this court should be slow to interfere").
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Luther, Unpublished Decision (12-13-2000)
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1409 , 20 L.Ed.2d 281 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Howard, Unpublished Decision (3-8-2000)
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122 , 128 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 , 20 L.Ed.2d 281 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Whiston v. Bio-Lab, Inc.
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122, 128 , 38 O.O.2d 298, 302 , 224 N.E.2d 126, 130 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1409 , 20 L.Ed.2d 281 ; Humphrey v. State (1984), 14 Ohio App.3d 15, 18 , 14 OBR 18, 21, 469 N.E .2d 981, 985.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Manning
Evid.R. 401, 402; see, generally, State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122, 128 , 38 O.O.2d 298, 302 , 224 N.E.2d 126, 130 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1409 , 20 L.Ed.2d 281 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Moreland
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 122, 128 , 38 O.O. 2d 298, 302, 224 N.E. 2d 126, 130 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 .
cited
Cited "see"
Oakbrook Realty Corp. v. Blout
See State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St. 2d 122, 128 , 38 O.O. 2d 298, 302, 224 N.E. 2d 126, 130 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Solomon Gaines
See Escobar v. United States, 388 F.2d 661, 664-65 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1411 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall L. Parks, No. 73-2786 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
See Escobar v. United States, 388 F.2d 661, 667 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1141 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968); Holbrook v. United States, 216 F.2d 238, 240 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 915 , 75 S.Ct. 605 , 99 L.Ed. 1249 (1955). 4 Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the Government, the jury verdict is amply supported by the facts.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parks
See Escobar v. United States, 388 F.2d 661, 667 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1141 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 (1968); Holbrook v. United States, 216 F.2d 238, 240 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 915 , 75 S.Ct. 605 , 99 L.Ed. 1249 (1955).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Hamilton Farabee
We consider it sufficient. [Cases cited].” See also Grene v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 360 F.2d 585, 586 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 978 , 87 S.Ct. 522 , 17 L.Ed.2d 440 ; Woodring v. United States, 10 Cir. 1967, 376 F.2d 619 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 885 , 88 S.Ct. 153 , 19 L.Ed.2d 182 ; accord, Escobar v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 388 F.2d 661 , cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1411 , 20 L.Ed.2d 282 ; Hoover v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 358 F.2d 87 , cert. denied, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S.Ct. 50 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webb v. Grafton Correctional Inst., Unpublished Decision (7-15-2004)
See, also, State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122 , 128 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 , 88 S.Ct. 1409 (observing that "[t]he trial court has broad discretion in the admission and exclusion of evidence and unless it has clearly abused its discretion and the defendant has been materially prejudiced thereby, this court should be slow to interfere"); Evid.R. 104(A) (providing that preliminary questions concerning the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by a court subject to the provisions of Evid.R. 104[B]). {¶ 17} Here, we find the evidence does not support plaintiff's co…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Pennington, Unpublished Decision (1-29-2002)
See State v. Sage (1987), 31 Ohio St.3d 173 , paragraph two of the syllabus; see, also, State v. Hymore (1967), 9 Ohio St.2d 122 , 128 , certiorari denied (1968), 390 U.S. 1024 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuels
v.
California
v.
California
No. 921.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1968.
Evander C. Smith for petitioner. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and John T. Murphy, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.