green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1974
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Obregon v. United States
(2×)
But see United States v. Whitley, 491 F.2d 1248, 1249 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974) (comparative disparities tend to distort reality when applied to group that represents only small part of overall population).
examined
Cited "but see"
James Ross, Jr. v. Theodore Ristaino
(4×)
But see United States v. Walker, 491 F.2d 236 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 768 (1974) (prosecution for uttering forged U.S. treasury check; inquiry about racial prejudice not mandated because no racial overtones shown); Commonowealth v. Brown, 228 Pa.Super. 166 , 323 A.2d 281 (1974) (conviction for forcible rape affirmed by 3 to 2 vote; requested racial question held irrelevant and overbroad) 6 We observe with respect to our brother's dissenting opinion that whenever trial judges are vested with broad discretion it is possible to evoke Pandora, but only i…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castillo-Garcia
(2×)
See Torres, 908 F.2d at 1423 (citing United States v. Rizzo, 491 F.2d 215 [2d Cir.], cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 [1974]); United States v. Willis, 890 F.2d 1099, 1102 (10th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Keith Sherlin (94-6111) and Tracy Teague (94-6112)
(2×)
Thus, the Fifth Circuit declined “to extend Brady’s reach by holding that a discovery motion addressed in effect to a court or its probation officer, rather than the prosecution, asking production of a witness’ presentence report, must be granted under Brady’s authority.” 556 F.2d at 1271 ; see United States v. Walker, 491 F.2d 236, 238 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pion
See Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 ("absolute disparity" standard more ___ _____ appropriate than "comparative disparity" standard where allegedly underrepresented group constitutes very small proportion of the total population) (citing United States v. Whitley, 491 F.2d ______________ _______ 1248, 1249 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 (1974)).5 For _____ ______ the reasons stated in Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 , the "comparative _____ disparity" standard should not be employed in circumstances where "a small variation in the figures used to calculate comparative ____________________ 5The "comparative…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pion
See Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 ("absolute disparity" standard more appropriate than "comparative disparity" standard where allegedly underrepresented group constitutes very small proportion of the total population) (citing United States v. Whitley, 491 F.2d 1248, 1249 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 (1974)).5 For the reasons stated in Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 , the "comparative disparity" standard should not be employed in circumstances where "a small variation in the figures used to calculate comparative 5The "comparative disparity" standard would measure the percentage spread between the tota…
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Rene M. Pion
(4×)
See Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 (“absolute disparity” standard more appropriate than “comparative disparity” standard where allegedly underrepresented group constitutes very small proportion of the total population) (citing United States v. Whitley, 491 F.2d 1248, 1249 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974)). 5 For the reasons stated in Hafen, 726 F.2d at 24 , the “comparative disparity” standard should not be employed in circumstances where “a small variation in the figures used to calculate comparative disparity can produce a significant differ…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
(2×)
See United States v. Rizzo, 491 F.2d 215 , 217 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert.denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974). 58 .
cited
Cited "see"
John S. Czajka v. James Hickman, Sheriff Clint Coplin, Deputy Sheriff Al Turley, Deputy Sheriff
See United States v. Burch, 490 F.2d 1300, 1303 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2400 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974); see generally 2 Louisell & Mueller, Federal Evidence § 125 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rocco v. Filipponio
(2×)
See generally Walker v. United States, 489 F.2d 714 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 768 (1974).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Antonio Mitchell
(3×)
See United States v. Walker, 491 F.2d 236, 238 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 99 (5, 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 768 (1974); cf. United States v. Crutchley, 502 F.2d 1195, 1199 (3d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Levasseur
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Whitley, 491 F.2d 1248 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974) (applying absolute disparity analysis to a jury selection challenge asserting due process, Sixth Amendment and equal protection grounds.) 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willie Terry, United States of America v. Eric Nalven, Robert Guippone, Willard Williams, Onzelo Markum, Clarence Haynes, Saint Julian Harrison, Paul Jenkins, and Anthony Michael Porcelli, Defendants
(2×)
Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128, 139-43 , 98 S.Ct. 1717, 1724-26 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978); United States v. Tortorello, 480 F.2d 764, 784-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 866 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); see also, United States v. Rizzo, 491 F.2d 215 , 217 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974). 32 Our holding does not convert the electronic surveillance order into a general warrant in violation of the Fourth Amendment requirement that search warrants particularly describe the things to be seized.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Terry
(2×)
Scott v. United States, 436 U.S. 128, 139-43 , 98 S.Ct. 1717, 1724-26 , 56 L.Ed.2d 168 (1978); United States v. Tortorello, 480 F.2d 764, 784-85 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 866 , 94 S.Ct. 63 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973); see also, United States v. Rizzo, 491 F.2d 215 , 217 n. 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 769 (1974).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tyrone B. Diggs, United States of America v. Garrett J. Keys, United States of America v. Percy Floyd, (Two Cases)
(4×)
See, e. g., United States v. Walker, 491 F.2d 236, 239 (CA 9), Cert. denied, 416 U.S. 990 , 94 S.Ct. 2399 , 40 L.Ed.2d 768 (1974) and United States v. Grant, 494 F.2d 120, 122-123 (CA 2 1974).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 73-6285.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1974.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 8th. Cir. Certiorari denied.