green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Volpe
But see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir. 1975), [cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976)].
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Clarence J. Matya
But see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir. 1975), [cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976)].
discussed
Cited "see"
Streambend Properties II, LLC v. Ivy Tower Minneapolis, LLC
Thus, § 1703(a)(2) has been described as “a general anti-fraud provision.” Rice v. Branigar Org., Inc., 922 F.2d 788 , 791 n. 4 (11th Cir.1991); accord United States v. Goldberg, 527 F.2d 165, 167 (2d Cir.1975) (“general fraud provisions”), cer t. denied 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cunningham
See State v. Caron, 288 N.C. 467 , 219 S.E.2d 68 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 48 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Dejesus Gonzalez
See United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom Woodruff v. United States, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Billis v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 509, n. 11, 12 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied sub nom., Woodruff v. United States, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976). [14] See also Hopkinson v. State, 664 P.2d 43, 51-52 (Wyo. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 , for this court's brief examination of the history of this court's rule making.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodriguez
See U.S. v. Young, 822 F.2d 1234, 1237 (2d Cir.1987) (“wiretapping is particularly appropriate when the telephone is routinely relied on to conduct the criminal enterprise under investigation”), citing U.S. v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Hayden
See United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (5th Cir.1975) (“The Executive remains the absolute judge of whether a prosecution should be initiated and the first and presumptively the best judge of whether a pending prosecution should be terminated.”), cert. denied sub nom., Woodruff v. United States, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976); see also United States v. Wallace, 848 F.2d 1464, 1468 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
Accord, State v. Caron, 288 N.C. 467 , 219 S.E. 2d 68 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed. 2d 794 (1976). [Sufficient evidence where fire was of incendiary origin; defendant was in shop shortly before fire; 30 minutes later defendant was seen with ashes and soot on his face and clothes for which defendant had no explanation]; State v. Sheetz, 46 N.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Zambrana, Sr., Charles Cole and Jay Zambrana
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2nd Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter David Tallmadge
(2×)
See Santiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488, 491-92 (9th Cir.1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
TUAKOI
See San- tiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward O'Grady
(2×)
See United States v. Trotta, 525 F.2d 1096, 1100 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Jannotti, 673 F.2d 578, 594-95 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1106 , 102 S.Ct. 2906 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1315 (1982); United States v. Dozier, 672 F.2d 531, 539 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 943 , 103 S.Ct. 256 , 74 L.Ed.2d 200 (1982); United States v. Hedman, 630 F.2d 1184, 1195 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 965 , 101 S.Ct. 1481 , 67 L.Ed.2d 614 (1981). 46 Common law extortion is the unlawful taking by any officer under color of his offi…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero, Nicholas Santora, Anthony Rabito, and Antonio Tomasulo
(2×)
Viewing the affidavits submitted in support of the wiretap applications in a “ ‘common sense and realistic fashion’ ”, United States v. Ivic, 700 F.2d 51, 57 (2d Cir.1983); see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir.1975), cert denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976), and with the deference properly accorded to the issuing judge, United States v. Perry, 643 F.2d 38, 50 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 454 U.S. 835 , 102 S.Ct. 138 , 70 L.Ed.2d 115 (1981); see United States v. Todisco, 667.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert James Miller
See United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Thomas B. Sawyer v. County of Sonoma and Retirement Board of the County of Sonoma, Defendants
See Santiago v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 488, 492 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis E. Garcia-Duarte
We have consistently held, however, that “[m]ere familiarity with a drug dealer does not make one a member of his conspiracy; nor does association with a conspirator provide a sufficient basis for the admissibility of hearsay statements of an alleged co-conspirator.” United States v. Terry, 702 F.2d at 320 ; see United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1134 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Fantuzzi, 463 F.2d 683, 690 (2d Cir.1972); United States v. Ragland, 375 F.2d at 477 ; see also United States v. Fitzharris, 633 F.2d …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harvey
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen D. Dupris, in Re United States of America
See United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976). 1 .
cited
Cited "see"
Shohreh Ghajar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
See Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 488 , 491 — 92 (9th Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loften
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1132 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dong Sik Kwon v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
(2×)
See, Santiago v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); Yoo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 534 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1976). 46 The final point made in the proposed opinion is that if equitable relief is ever proper, Hibi limits the situations in which it should be granted to those that constitute an estoppel.
cited
Cited "see"
National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan
See Santiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 91 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Egidio Cerilli, in No. 78-2105. Maylan Yackovich, in No. 78-2106. John Shurina, in No. 78-2107. Ralph Buffone, in No. 78-2439
(2×)
See U. S. v. Green, 350 U.S. 415, 420 , 76 S.Ct. 522 , 100 L.Ed. 494 (1956), U. S. v. Trotta, 525 F.2d 1096 , 1098 n.2 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); U. S. v. Provenzano, 334 F.2d 678, 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 947 , 85 S.Ct. 440 , 13 L.Ed.2d 544 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah Corporation
(2×)
See Santiago v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 488 , 492 n. 9 (9th Cir. 1975), Cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976). 19 Clearly, these cases do not fully describe the dimensions of government estoppel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1333-34 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Johnson, 513 F.2d 819, 823-24 (2d Cir. 1975); United States v. Fantuzzi, 463 F.2d 683, 689-90 (2d Cir. 1972); United States v. Cianchetti, 315 F.2d 584, 587-88 (2d Cir. 1963); United States v. Stromberg, 268 F.2d 256, 267 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 863 , 80 S.Ct. 119 , 4 L.Ed.2d 102 (1959). 94 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Montgomery Hooker, Appellant-Petitioner v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, N.D. Of California, Appellee-Respondent
(2×)
See United States v. Choate, 527 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Esposito
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Panebianco
See United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1133 (2d Cir. 1975) , cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Doe, a Juvenile
See United States v. Wallace, 848 F.2d 1464, 1468 (9th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504, 513 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ronald R. Gooding v. Gary Stotts, Secretary of Corrections and Attorney General of the State of Kansas
Consistent with these principles, the Supreme Court has expressly "disparaged 'rigid, mechanical' rules in the interpretation of the Double Jeopardy Clause." Serfass, 420 U.S. at 390 (quoting Somerville, 410 U.S. at 467 ); see also United States v. Choate, 527 F.2d 748, 751 (9th Cir. 1975) ("Whether jeopardy attache[d] is based on flexible policy considerations rather than hard and fast rules." (Citations omitted)), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 (1976). 26 With this understanding in mind, we believe the State's argument that jeopardy does not attach until the trial court formally accepts a writte…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar Ullyses-Salazar
See, e.g., Santiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488, 491 (9th Cir.1975) (en banc), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tillem
See, e.g., United States v. Goldberg, 527 F.2d 165, 173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Perl, 210 F.2d 457, 461-62 (2d Cir.1954).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Moe Tillem, Appeal of Thomas Overton, Desmond Larrier, Astley Campbell, Elissa Cohen-Deutsch, A/K/A \Lisa\"
See, e.g., United States v. Goldberg, 527 F.2d 165, 173 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976); United States v. Perl, 210 F.2d 457, 461-62 (2d Cir.1954).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gold
See also United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1132 (2d Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976) (lack of specific intent while superficially similar to insanity defense is legally distinct and less difficult to establish) (citing Brawner, 471 F.2d at 998-1003 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Or., Dept. of Human Resources v. Heckler
In a series of cases culminating in Miranda v. INS, 673 F.2d 1105 (9th Cir.1982), rev’d 459 U.S. 14 , 103 S.Ct. 281 , 74 L.Ed.2d 12 (1982); see also United States v. Ruby Co., 588 F.2d 697 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2838 , 61 L.Ed.2d 284 (1979), Santiago v. INS, 526 F.2d 488 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976), United States v. Lazy FC Ranch, 481 F.2d 985 (9th Cir.1973), the Ninth Circuit has indicated that, although it is disfavored, equitable estoppel may be pressed against the government “where justice and fair play…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas Escobar Noble
Compare United States v. Cowan, 524 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2168 , 48 L.Ed.2d 795 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard P. Lavin v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army of the United States, and the United States Army
See, e. g., Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 526 F.2d 488, 493 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976) (en banc immigration decision finding no estoppel, and recognizing that while the modifier “affirmative” suggests a distinction between nonfeasance and misfeasance, “these are slippery terms”); United States v. Wharton, 514 F.2d 406, 412 (9th Cir. 1975) (finding estoppel applicable in a public lands case, where defendants “complain of affirmative misconduct on the part of government officials who gave them incorrect inform…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Thompson
See also United States v. Steinberg, 525 F.2d 1126, 1132 (2d Cir. 1975), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 971 (1976); United States v. Henry, 417 F.2d 267, 270-271 (2d Cir. 1969), cert, denied, 397 U.S. 953 (1970). 8 For a jury instruction which covers the situation when agents are used, see 1 E.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jung-Nam Yang and Seung-Han Yang v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Compare Santiago v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 526 F.2d 488 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 971 , 96 S.Ct. 2167 , 48 L.Ed.2d 794 (1976) (failure to inform of immigration requirements insufficient), with Yoo v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 534 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir. 1976) (delay in determining visa eligibility sufficient).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
v.
Poster Exchange, Inc.
v.
Poster Exchange, Inc.
No. 75-1018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.