green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1976 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1976
2001
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. (Under Seal), in Re Grand Jury Subpoena
in the absence of special circumstances, the amount of money paid or owed to an attorney by his client is generally not within the attorney-client privilege.
discussed
Cited "see"
Saville v. Houston County Healthcare Authority
See Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70-72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Coley v. M & M Mars, Inc., 461 F.Supp. 1073, 1076 (M.D.Ga.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mahoney v. National Organization for Women
See Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Stevens v. Frick, 372 F.2d 378 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 920 , 89 S.Ct. 2034 , 18 L.Ed.2d 973 (1967) (“merely by holding its courts open to the litigation of complaints ... [a state] does not clothe persons who use its judicial process with the authority of the state”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry v. Atlas Van Lines, Inc.
See accord Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 71 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976) (affirming summary judgment in favor of a corporation and its board of directors as to the plaintiff’s § 1985(3) conspiracy claim where “plaintiff did not allege that any of the individual defendants acted in any other capacity than his official role as director”); Bianco v. American Broadcasting Co., Inc., 470 F.Supp. 182, 184 (N.D.Ill.1979) (dismissing allegations of intracorpo-rate conspiracy where the plaintiff challenged a specific …
discussed
Cited "see"
Valdan Sportswear v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
People v. 11 Cornwell Co., 695 F.2d 34 , 41 (2d Cir.1982); see Girard v. 94th St. & 5th Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70-71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Bereswill v. Yablon, 6 N.Y.2d 301, 305 , 160 N.E.2d 531, 533 , 189 N.Y.S.2d 661, 664 (1959); cf. Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp., — U.S. —, — - —, 104 S.Ct. 2731, 2743-46 , 81 L.Ed.2d 628 (U.S.1984) (Sherman Act conspiracy is not alleged by averments of "intra-enterprise” agreements). 18 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Riley
See State v. Stadie, 112 Ariz. 196 , 540 P.2d 668 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2174 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 .
cited
Cited "see"
Danny Clark CROSS, Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Appellee
Accord Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buntin v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES, ETC.
See, Girard v. 94th Street & 5th Avenue Corporation, 530 F.2d 66 (2nd Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1978); Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 505 F.2d 181 (8th Cir. 1974); Dombrowski v. Dowling, 459 F.2d 190 (7th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Buckner v. Lower Florida Keys Hosp. Dist.
Accord, Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corporation, 530 F.2d 66 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976) [suit brought under 42 U.S.C.A. 1985(3); identified individuals who comprise board of directors cannot conspire when acting in their official capacities].
discussed
Cited "see"
Kling v. Commissioner
See W & W Fertilizer Corp. v. United States , 527 F. 2d 621 , 624-625 (Ct. Cl. 1975) , cert. denied 425 U.S. 974 (1976) ; Fulk & Needham, Inc. v. United States , 411 F. 2d 1403 , 1406 (4th Cir. 1969) .
discussed
Cited "see"
Schroeder v. Dayton-Hudson Corp.
See Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 505 F.2d 181 (8th Cir. 1974); Dombrowski v. Dowling, 459 F.2d 190, 193-96 (7th Cir. 1972); Milburn v. Blackfrica Promotions, Inc., 392 F.Supp. 434 (S.D.N.Y. 1974); Cole v. University of Hartford, 391 F.Supp. 888 (D.Conn.1975); contra Rackin v. University of Pennsylvania, 386 F.Supp. 992, 1005-06 (E.D.Pa.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Crane Co. v. American Standard, Inc.
See generally Girard v. 94th St. & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 72 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Kavit v. A. L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robins v. Max Mara, U.S.A., Inc.
See also Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70-71 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Dombrowski v. Dowling, 459 F.2d 190 (7th Cir.1972); Rini v. Zwirn, 886 F.Supp. 270, 291-92 (E.D.N.Y.1995).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Giuliano v. Everything Yogurt, Inc.
See, e.g., Agugliaro v. Brooks Bros., Inc., 802 F.Supp. 956, 962 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (citing Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976)); Marmott v. Maryland Lumher Co., 807 F.2d 1180, 1184 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 929 , 107 S.Ct. 3214 , 96 L.Ed.2d 700 (1987); see also Hecht, 897 F.2d at 26 n. 5 (not reaching the issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stephen Tornay, Galene Tornay v. United States of America A.R. Demeter, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service
See In re Osterhoudt, 722 F.2d 591, 594 (9th Cir.1983) (subpoena for fee arrangement information); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum (Lahodny), 695 F.2d 363, 365 (9th Cir.1982) (subpoena for fee information); In re Grand Jury Witness (Salas), 695 F.2d. 359, 362 (9th Cir.1982) (subpoena for fee information); United States v. Sherman, 627 F.2d 189, 192 (9th Cir.1980) (IRS summons for amount of fees); see also United States v. Haddad, 527 F.2d 537, 539 (6th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 797 (1976); In re Michaelson, 511 F.2d 882, 888 (9th Cir.), cert. deni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rennick v. Champion International Corp.
See also, Girard v. 94th Street & 5th Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 505 F.2d 181 (8th Cir.1974), Dombrowski v. Dowling, 459 F.2d 190, 196 (7th Cir.1972); Fallis v. Dunbar, 386 F.Supp. 1117, 1121 (N.D.Ohio 1974), aff'd., 532 F.2d 1061 (6th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Givan v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
See also Girard v. 94th Street & 5th Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 70 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Baker v. Stuart Broadcasting Co., 505 F.2d 181 (8th Cir.1974), Dombrowski v. Dowling, 459 F.2d 190, 196 (7th Cir.1972); Fallis v. Dunbar, 386 F.Supp. 1117, 1121 (N.D.Ohio 1974), aff’d., 532 F.2d 1061 (6th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Republican Party of State of Conn. v. Tashjian
See also Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Weise v. Syracuse University, 522 F.2d 397, 405 (2d Cir.1975); Jackson v. Statler Foundation, 496 F.2d 623, 628-629 (2d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 927 , 95 S.Ct. 1124 , 43 L.Ed.2d 397 (1975); Lefcourt v. Legal Aid Society, 445 F.2d 1150 , 1155 n. 6 (2d Cir.1971); Stewart v. New York University, 430 F.Supp. 1305 , 1311 n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1976). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gerosa Inc. v. Dole
See, e.g., Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 72 (2nd Cir.1976), cert, denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976) (dismissing state claim to “avoid making ‘[njeedless' decisions of state law’ ”); Wigginess Inc. v. Fruchtman, 482 F.Supp. 681 (S.D.N.Y.1979), affd 628 F.2d 1346 (2nd Cir.1980), cert, denied, 449 U.S. 842 , 101 S.Ct. 122 , 66 L.Ed.2d 50 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williamsburg Fair Housing Committee v. New York City Housing Authority
See generally Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co., supra, 419 U.S. at 351 , 95 S.Ct. at 453 (“[T]he inquiry must be whether there is a sufficiently close nexus between the State and the challenged action of the [private] entity so that the action of the latter may be fairly treated as that of the State itself.”); see also, e. g., Girard v. 94th Street & Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66, 69-70 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976); Coleman v. Wagner College, 429 F.2d 1120 (2d Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffman v. Moore
Home v Whalen, 62 AD2d 23 ; see, also, Matter of Sigety v Hynes, 38 NY2d 260 , cert den 425 US 974 ), and respondent council acts reasonably when it seeks to insure that the actual owners of nursing homes will bear responsibility for their operation.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ludtke v. Kuhn
See Weise v. Syracuse University, supra, at 406; compare, Girard v. 94th Street and Fifth Avenue Corp., 530 F.2d 66 (2d Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2173 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tatlow & Pledger (PTY) Ltd. v. Hermann Forwarding Co.
See, e. g., Dixie Plywood Co. v. S. S. Federal Lines, 404 F.Supp. 461 (S.D.Ga.), aff’d 525 F.2d 691 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2174 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rapp v. Carey
Moreover, it is essential that the Governor obtain the information sought by Executive Order No. 10.1 so that if there are defects in the present code of ethics which affect the "condition of the state” (NY Const, art IV, § 3), the Governor might communicate them to the Legislature together with appropriate recommendations for their elimination (Matter of Di Brizzi [Proskauer], 303 NY 206, 216 , supra; see, also, Matter of Sigety v Hynes, 38 NY2d 260 , cert den 425 US 974 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. LaPage
Bellis v. United States, 417 U.S. 85 , 94 S.Ct. 2179 , 40 L.Ed.2d 678 (1974); Wilson v. United States, 221 U.S. 361 , 31 S.Ct. 538 , 55 L.Ed. 771 (1911); United States v. Slutsky, 352 F.Supp. 1105 (S.D.N.Y.1972); see also Sigety v. Hynes, 38 N.Y.2d 260 , 379 N.Y.S.2d 724 , 342 N.E.2d 518 (1975), cert. den. 425 U.S. 974 , 96 S.Ct. 2174 , 48 L.Ed.2d 798 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pitt River Tribe of Indians
v.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
v.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
No. 75-1286.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 19, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (1)
Ct. App. Cal., 3d App. Dist. Certiorari denied.