green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Wiley v. United States
See Irwin v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89, 96 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990), reh’g denied, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 805 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
Hickman v. United States
See Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs, 498 U.S. 89 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , 112 L.Ed.2d 435 (1990), rehearing denied 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 805 , 112 L.Ed.2d 865 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Smith
See United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 61 (3d Cir. 1990), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 (1991).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. J. David Smith, David Smith
See United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 61 (3d Cir.1990), ce rt. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Saccoccia
See United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60, 65 (3rd Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Grayson, 795 F.2d 278, 282 (3rd Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1054 , 107 S.Ct. 927 , 93 L.Ed.2d 978 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Byers v. Robinson, 08ap-204 (9-23-2008)
See, also, Irwin v. Dept. of Veterans Affairs (1990), 498 U.S. 89 , 95 , 111 S.Ct. 453 , rehearing denied (1991), 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 805 , quoting Hallstrom v. Tillamook Cty. (1989), 493 U.S. 20 , 27 , 110 S.Ct. 304 , rehearing denied (1990), 493 U.S. 1037 , 110 S.Ct. 761 (stating that "[t]ime requirements in lawsuits between private litigants are customarily subject to `equitable tolling'"); 51 American Jurisprudence 2d (2000), 563, Limitation of Actions, Sections 174 and 175. {¶ 54} Although under federal common law time limitation periods are customarily subject to equitable tolling…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. Curcio
See also United States v. Esposito, 912 F.2d 60 (3d Cir.1990) (prosecution of predicate offenses subsequent to a RICO acquittal did not violate double jeopardy), cert. dismissed, 498 U.S. 1075 , 111 S.Ct. 806 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1991); United States v. Esposito, 968 F.2d 300, 302 (3d Cir.1992) ("[Bjecause the jury found Esposito not guilty of the overall RICO charge, the jury did not answer any special interrogatories as to whether he had committed the specific predicate acts charged against him”); Pungitore, 910 F.2d at 1107 n. 21 (RICO prosecution based in part on a predicate act previousl…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arcadia, Ohio
v.
Ohio Power Co. Perry v. Louisiana Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs Cook v. United States Green v. Law Firm of Wiseman, Blackburn, Futrell & Cohen
v.
Ohio Power Co. Perry v. Louisiana Irwin v. Department of Veterans Affairs Cook v. United States Green v. Law Firm of Wiseman, Blackburn, Futrell & Cohen
No. 89-1283; No. 89-5120; No. 89-5867; No. 89-7584; No. 89-7822.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1991.
498 U.S. 1075
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published
ante, p. 73;
ante, p. 38;
ante, p. 89;
ante, p. 832; and
ante, p. 842. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Justice Souter took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.