green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Giammettei
Id. at 96 , 108 S.Ct. at 403 ; but see Kilpatrick v. Riddle, 907 F.2d 1523, 1529-33 (5th Cir.1990) (Brown, J., dissenting) (making the argument that D’Oench, Duhme should not preclude fraud defenses based on federal securities laws), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 954 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1042 (1991).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Giammettei
Id. at 96 , 108 S.Ct. at 403 ; but see Kilpatrick v. Riddle, 907 F.2d 1523, 1529-33 (5th Cir.1990) (Brown, J., dissenting) (making the argument that D'Oench, Duhme should not preclude fraud defenses based on federal securities laws), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 954 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1042 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Drake v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
drug testing performed by private employers under compulsion of government regulations constitutes governmental action subject to constitutional restrictions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Allen David Daniel
See United States v. Barth, 899 F.2d 199 (2d Cir.1990) (probation), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 953 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1042 (1991); United States v. Copley, 978 F.2d 829 (4th Cir.1992) (supervised release); United States v. Gilbert, 990 F.2d 916 (6th Cir.1993) (supervised release); United States v. Yancey, 827 F.2d 83 (7th Cir.1987) (probation), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 967 , 108 S.Ct. 1239 , 99 L.Ed.2d 437 (1988); Morishita v. Morris, 702 F.2d 207 (10th Cir.1983) (probation); United States v. Copeland, 20 F.3d 412 (11th Cir.1994) (supervised release).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re American Honda Motor Co. Dealerships Litig.
See generally United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1194 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore T. Rybicki, United States of America v. Karen D. Rybicki, United States of America v. Theodore T. Rybicki, United States of America v. Theodore T. Rybicki Karen D. Rybicki
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1191-92 (4th Cir.1990) (declining to extend Bruton 's protection where defendant's name was redacted from non-testifying codefendant's statement which incriminated defendant by inference), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Mason Gray, (Two Cases)
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1192 (4th Cir.1990) (reasoning that assessments of relevance and prejudice of evidence are committed to broad discretion of district judge), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas Fred Dorsey
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1193 (4th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991) (finding that testimony suggesting that the defendant had *818 been previously jailed, in light of curative instructions, was not sufficiently prejudicial to warrant mistrial where “the matter only came up incidentally, neither the witness nor the prosecution made any repeated reference to it, and the court carefully instructed as to its permissible use”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis Banks, A/K/A Cornell Lewis
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1192-93 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 (1991). 16 Appellant alleges that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial when a DEA agent testified that in debriefing coconspirator Jones, he believed Jones provided "good information." The Government agreed to the court's striking that portion of the agent's testimony, which the court did.
cited
Cited "see"
Rouse v. Nielsen
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1193-94 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Syvalius Walston
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1200-01 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 (1991). 12 The indictment refers to "defraud[ing] the United States" and makes no reference to any other statute.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude v. Cooley, United States of America v. Lois F. Pearce
See United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1193 (4th Cir. 1990) (noting cautionary instruction and lack of repeated reference as factors supporting finding of harmless error), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Danella
In Alston , which relied on Curran , Judge Garth specifically noted that the Alston indictment alleged “no more than a conspiracy to defraud the United States by structuring, a far different conspiracy than the genre of ‘Klein conspiracies’ relied on by the government.” Alston, supra, at 715 (footnote omitted); see also id. at 720 n. 17 (citing Klein and noting that “[several courts have sustained Klein convictions when the evidence sufficed to prove an accompanying ‘intent and purpose of impeding and obstructing the IRS in the collection of revenue and the performance of its dutie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Nuth
United States v. Caicedo-Llanos, 960 F.2d 158, 164 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1198 (4th Cir.1990) (noting, but not invoking, procedural waiver of issue raised for first time in defendant’s reply brief), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Nuth
United States v. Caicedo-Llanos, 960 F.2d 158, 164 (D.C.Cir.1992); see also United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1198 (4th Cir.1990) (noting, but not invoking, procedural waiver of issue raised for first time in defendant's reply brief), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fisher v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1201 (4th Cir.1990) (upon post-conviction challenge to sufficiency of indictment, “every intendment is then indulged in support of ... sufficiency”), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991); Mallen, 843 F.2d at 1102 (indictment challenged for first time after verdict will be construed liberally in favor of sufficiency and there will be no reversal absent prejudice unless indictment "cannot, within reason, be construed to charge a crime"); Campos-Asencio, 822 F.2d at 508 (indictment will be construed liberally wh…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Timothy Stringfield, A/K/A Little Joe, United States of America v. Russell Dabney, Sr., A/K/A Shorty, United States of America v. Lionela. Stith, A/K/A Nooney Baby, A/K/A Buck, United States of America v. Eric Stith, A/K/A Snake
Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200, 211 (1986); see also United States v. Vogt, 910 F.2d 1184, 1191-92 (4th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 (1991) (co-defendant's confession is admissible when it is redacted to replace the defendant's name with a symbol or a neutral pronoun).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MacCaskill v. United States
Similar provisions grant the Secretary of State the authority to "pay tort claims ... when such claims arise in foreign countries in connection with Department of State operations abroad.” 22 U.S.C. § 2669 (f); see also Tarpeh-Doe v. U.S., 904 F.2d 719, 722 (D.C.Cir.1990) cert. denied 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 955 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1991). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murphy v. Federal Deposit Insurance
See In re NBW Commercial Paper Litigation, 826 F.Supp. at 1466-69 ; see also (citing Kilpatrick v. Riddle, 907 F.2d 1523, 1529 (5th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1083 , 111 S.Ct. 954 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1042 (1991)). 7 Accordingly, the Court shall grant Summary Judgment on Count III for the Defendant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Quality Inns International, Inc.
v.
L. B. H. Associates Limited Partnership
v.
L. B. H. Associates Limited Partnership
No. 90-664.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1991.
498 U.S. 1083
Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.