green
Positive treatment
10.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brau v. ELA
(2×)
Williams v. United States, 535 US 911, 919 (2002), voto particular del Juez Breyer. (1) I Hace unos días, el Gobernador de Puerto Rico, Hon.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Beer v. United States
(6×)
also: Cited "see"
Williams v. United States, 535 U.S. 911, 917 (2002) (Breyer, J., joined by Scalia & Kennedy, JJ., dissenting). 7 BEER v. US though the President generally did not announce a final amount until after the blocking statutes were enacted. 4 Thus, the COLA in Will Year 3 was just as “precise and definite” as the COLAs in the Williams years.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Maron v. Silver
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Implicit in the Court’s reasoning in United States v Will (supra) is the conclusion that the Compensation Clause does not require that judicial salaries must be kept apace with inflation (see Williams v United States, 535 US at 921 [Breyer, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari]; United States v Hatter, 532 US at 583-584 [Scalia, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part]).
discussed
Cited "see"
DAVIS v. United States
See Williams, 535 U.S. at 917–18 (Breyer, J., joined by Scalia and Kennedy, JJ., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (explaining that the 1975 Adjustment Act’s COLAs were “neither definite nor precise” and framing the relevant question as “whether the [ERA’s COLA provisions are] sufficiently precise and definite to have created an ‘expectation’ that the Compensation Clause protects” (citation omitted)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allapattah Services, Incorporated v. Exxon Corporation
(2×)
As the Chief Justice recognized in his 2003 annual address, the federal judiciary's workload is at a "record high[]." Chief Justice William Rehnquist, 2003 Year-End Report on the Federal Judiciary (Jan. 1, 2004), available at http://www.supremecourtus.gov/publicinfo/year-end/2003year-endreport.html (last referenced Feb. 18, 2004); see also Williams v. United States, 535 U.S. 911, 920 , 122 S.Ct. 1221, 1227 , 152 L.Ed.2d 153 (2002) (Breyer, J., dissenting) (noting "rapidly rising caseloads" in the federal courts). 72 The supplemental jurisdiction question warrants certiorari review because of t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clements
v.
United States
v.
United States
01-8125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 4, 2002.
Published
CLEMENTS
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 01-8125.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 4, 2002.
1
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.