green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Williams v. Norris
See King v. Kemna, 266 F.3d 816, 821-22 (8th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002); see generally Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198 , 126 S.Ct. 1675 , 164 L.Ed.2d 376 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Marcel Williams v. Larry Norris
See King v. Kemna, 266 F.3d 816, 821-22 (8th Cir. 2001) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 (2002); see generally Day v. McDonough, 547 U.S. 198 (2006).
cited
Cited "see"
Dale Helmig v. Mike Kemna
See King v. Kemna, 266 F.3d 816 (8th Cir. 2001) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 (2002); Cooley v. Nix, 738 F.2d 345, 347 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1089 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dale Helmig, Petitioner-Appellee/cross v. Michael Kemna, Respondent-Appellant/cross
See King v. Kemna, 266 F.3d 816 (8th Cir.2001) (en banc), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002); Cooley v. Nix, 738 F.2d 345, 347 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1089 , 105 S.Ct. 597 , 83 L.Ed.2d 706 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tirado
See State v. Jaynes, 353 N.C. 534 , 563-64, 549 S.E.2d 179 , 200-01 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1310 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Tirado
See State v. Jaynes, 353 N.C. 534, 563-64 , 549 S.E.2d 179, 200-01 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 152 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
JOSEPH NICHOLAS BECK, JR., — v. MICHAEL BOWERSOX, —
(2×)
Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a federal court may not grant a writ of habeas corpus unless the state court decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,” or “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d). “[A]n unreasonable application of federal law is different from an incorrect application of federal law.” Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Beck v. Michael Bowersox
The Court held that Beck’s Miranda waiver was knowing and intelligent, observing, “It is simply incredulous to think that at the time of his arrest, defendant had forgotten that just a few days earlier he had specifically requested his mother to find him a lawyer.” 687 S.W.2d at 159 . -5- Under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, a federal court may not grant a writ of habeas corpus unless the state court decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,…
cited
Cited "see"
In re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings in the Airline Cases
See Condit v. United Air Lines, 558 F.2d 1176 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 98 S.Ct. 1510 , 55 L.Ed.2d 531 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1513, 17 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8586 in Re Consolidated Pretrial Proceedings in the Airline Cases. Appeal of American Airlines, Inc., and Trans World Airlines, Inc
See Condit v. United Air Lines, 558 F.2d 1176 (4th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 98 S.Ct. 1510 , 55 L.Ed.2d 531 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re E.D.
See State v. Garcia , 358 N.C. 382 , 406, 597 S.E.2d 724 , 742 (2004) (concluding that appellate review was automatically preserved when the prosecutor passed less than a full panel of twelve replacement jurors to the defendant during jury selection and thereby violated N.C.G.S. § 15A-1214(f) (2003) ), cert. denied , 543 U.S. 1156 , 125 S. Ct. 1301 , 161 L.Ed. 2d 122 (2005) ; see also State v. Jaynes , 353 N.C. 534 , 544-45, 549 S.E.2d 179 , 189 (2001) (concluding that appellate review was automatically preserved when, in violation of N.C.G.S. § 15A-1214(d) (1999), the defendant was allowed …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Williams
See, e.g., State v. Jaynes, 353 N.C. 534, 556-57 , 549 S.E.2d 179, 196 (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 152 L.Ed. 2d 220 (2002); State v. Keel, 333 N.C. 52, 56-57 , 423 S.E.2d 458, 461 (1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Richardson
See also State v. Morris, 99-3075 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/3/00), 770 So.2d 908, 914 , writ denied, 00-3293 (La.10/12/01), 799 So.2d 496 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002). |17We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in allowing the introduction of the heroin seized from Joseph Williams’ hotel room.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Napoleon
See also, State v. Morris, 99-3075 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/3/00) , 770 So.2d 908, 914 , writ denied, 00-3293 (La.10/12/01), 799 So.2d 496 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Massey
See also, State v. Morris, 99-3075 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/3/00) , 770 So.2d 908, 914 , writ denied, 00-3293 (La.10/12/01), 799 So.2d 496 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Butler
See also, State v. Morris, 99-3075 (La.App. 1 Cir. 11/3/00) , 770 So.2d 908, 914 , writ denied, 00-3293 (La.10/12/01), 799 So.2d 496 , cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 122 S.Ct. 1311 , 152 L.Ed.2d 220 (2002). 37 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. McArthur
See also State v. Jaynes, 353 N.C. 534, 556 , 549 S.E.2d 179, 196 (2001) (“[W]hen the instruction actually given by the trial court varied from the pattern language, defendant was not required to object in order to preserve this question for appellate review.”), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 934 , 152 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Taylor
v.
North Carolina
v.
North Carolina
01-7588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 2002.
535 U.S. 934
Published
TAYLOR
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.
No. 01-7588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
1
Sup. Ct. N. C. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 354 N. C. 28, 550 S. E. 2d 141.