Williams v. Duncan, Warden, 537 U.S. 955 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Williams v. Duncan, Warden, 537 U.S. 955 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (29 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Marrero Pichardo v. Ashcroft (ca2, 2004-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marrero Pichardo v. Ashcroft
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dixon v. Miller, 293 F.3d 74, 80-81 (2d Cir.) (even if habeas petitioner procedurally defaulted on his claims, there is a limited exception to avoid "a fundamental miscarriage of justice") (quoting Coleman, 501 U.S. at 750 , 111 S.Ct. 2546 ), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 955 , 123 S.Ct. 426 , 154 L.Ed.2d 305 (2002); Theodoropoulos v. INS, 313 F.3d 732, 737 (2d Cir.2002) ("A petitioner may avoid even statutorily established administrative exhaustion requirements when ... [the petitioner raises] a substantial constitutional question."). 15 The First and Seventh Circuits have both suggested …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marrero Pichardo v. Ashcroft
2d Cir. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Dixon v. Miller, 293 F.3d 74, 80-81 (2d Cir.) (even if habeas petitioner procedurally defaulted on his claims, there is a limited exception to avoid “a fundamental miscarriage of justice”) (quoting Coleman, 501 U.S. at 750 , 111 S.Ct. 2546 ), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 955 , 123 S.Ct. 426 , 154 L.Ed.2d 305 (2002); Theodoropoulos v. INS, 313 F.3d 732, 737 (2d Cir.2002) (“A petitioner may avoid even statutorily established administrative exhaustion requirements when ... [the petitioner raises] a substantial constitutional question.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clem v. State
Nev. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cf. Pellegrini, 117 Nev. at 886 & n. 116, 34 P.3d at 536 & n. 116 (acknowledging that application of statutory procedural bars is mandatory); Bousley, 523 U.S. at 621-24 , 118 S.Ct. 1604 (recognizing that where claim under new decision interpreting federal statute has been defaulted, procedural bars apply but may be defeated by showing of actual innocence). [44] Kleve, 243 F.3d at 1151 (citing Pulley v. Harris, 465 U.S. 37, 42 , 104 S.Ct. 871 , 79 L.Ed.2d 29 (1984); Wainwright v. Stone, 414 U.S. 21, 23-24 , 94 S.Ct. 190 , 38 L.Ed.2d 179 (1973); LaRue v. McCarthy, 833 F.2d 140, 142-43 (9th Cir.…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
Duncan, Warden
02-5740.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 2002.
537 U.S. 955
Published

537 U.S. 955

WILLIAMS
v.
DUNCAN, WARDEN.

No. 02-5740.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 15, 2002.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 32 Fed. Appx. 923.