green
Positive treatment
published
Issue: per se ruleTX ↗
Issue: litmus testTX ↗
Issue: medical diagnosis and treatment exceptionTX ↗
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Cited for
stating that an objection based merely on “Daubert” is a general objection to an improper predicate that fails to inform the court about how the predicate is deficient and does not preserve error
- Randolph Nededog Rivera v. State, No. 07-04-00023-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Sept. 22, 2004).unpublished (stating that an objection based merely on “Daubert” is a general objection to an improper predicate that fails to inform the court about how the predicate is deficient and does not preserve error)
- Randolph Nededog Rivera v. State, No. 07-04-00022-CR (Tex. App.—Amarillo Sept. 22, 2004).unpublished (stating that an objection based merely on "Daubert" is a general objection to an improper predicate that fails to inform the court about how the predicate is deficient and does not preserve error)
Other citing cases
- Duran v. State, 163 S.W.3d 253 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2005).published
- David Duran v. State, No. 02-03-00423-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Apr. 14, 2005).published
- United States v. Assiter, 93 F. App'x 655 (5th Cir. 2004).unpublished
- Andrew Michael Cotterill v. State, No. 02-02-00343-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 17, 2003).unpublished
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gregory
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
02-1174.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 2003.
Published opinion
Published
GREGORY
v.
TEXAS.
No. 02-1174.
Supreme Court of United States.
April 21, 2003.
[*~978–979]1
CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT.
2
Ct. App. Tex., 14th Dist. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 56 S. W. 3d 164.