PER CURIAM:*

Wilford Earnest Lee appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Lee argues that he should not have received two criminal history points for his prior convictions for felony theft and for burglary of a building because these cases were disposed of as one case by the state court. He asserts that he should be re- sentenced under the safety valve adjustment in U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 02-40270 Because Lee did not raise the same challenge to his criminal history computation in the district court, we review this issue for plain error. See United States v. Green, 293 F.3d 886, 891 & n.3 (5th Cir. 2002). Although Lee was sentenced at the same time in both cases and received identical punishment in them, he has not shown that the cases were consolidated or related. See United States v. Huskey, 137 F.3d 283, 288 (5th Cir. 1998); U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(a)(2) & comment. (n.3). Therefore, the district court did not err in determining his criminal history, and he was ineligible for application of the safety valve. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(1).

AFFIRMED.