Weldon v. Weldon, 253 A.2d 16 (Conn. 1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Weldon v. Weldon, 253 A.2d 16 (Conn. 1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a man cannot serve two masters at the same time and the public interest should not be entrusted to an official who has a pecuniary, personal or private interest which is or may be in conflict with the public interest.”
38 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Boardman (vt, 2009-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) In Re Boardman
Vt. · 2009 · signal: see, e.g. · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
a man cannot serve two masters at the same time and the public interest should not be entrusted to an official who has a pecuniary, personal or private interest which is or may be in conflict with the public interest.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Graf v. Frame (2×)
W. Va. · 1986 · confidence medium
Anderson v. Zoning Commission, 157 Conn. 285, 290 , 253 A.2d 16, 19 (1968).
cited Cited "see" Kathleen Bryant v. Town of Wiscasset
Me. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Anderson v. Zoning Comm’n of Norwalk, 157 Conn. 285 , 253 A.2d 16, 20 (Conn. 1968); Szoke v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Monmouth Beach, 260 N.J.Super. 341 , 616 A.2d 942, 945 (N.J.
discussed Cited "see" Six Six One M. Tpk. v. Planning Zoning, No. Cv96 61220 S (May 18, 1999)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. Zoning Commission , 157 Conn. 285 , 294 , 253 A.2d 16 (1968) (spot zoning constitutes "an attempt to accommodate an individual property owner without any concern for the interests of the community"); Bartram v. Zoning Commission , 136 Conn. 89 , 94 , 68 A.2d 368 (1949) ("The vice of spot zoning lies in the fact that it singles out for special treatment a lot or a small area in a way that does not further [the best interests of the community as a whole].") The court finds that the commission properly regarded the Four Corners district as a whole and was not required to analyze t…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lewis Weldon
v.
Mildred M. Weldon
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 17, 1968.
253 A.2d 16
James N. Egan, for the appellant (plaintiff)., Norris L. O’Neill, for the appellee (defendant).
Published
Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed since the subordinate facts found support the referee’s conclusions and no error of law appears.

There is no error.