establishment clause in Indiana

8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1942–2005 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Hodgegreen conn · 1999 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See, e.g., State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207 , 726 A.2d 531 , 553 n. 43 (1999) (citing Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531-32 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993)) (for purposes of free exercise challenge, law restrictive of religious practice must be "narrowly tailored" to advance "compelling governmental interest"). . 2005See, e.g., State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207 , 726 A.2d 531 , 553 n. 43 (1999) (citing Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531-32 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993)) (for purposes of free exercise challenge, law restrictive of religious practice must be "narrowly tailored" to advance "compelling governmental interest"). .	1	1
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeahgreen scotus · 1993 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005See, e.g., State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207 , 726 A.2d 531 , 553 n. 43 (1999) (citing Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531-32 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993)) (for purposes of free exercise challenge, law restrictive of religious practice must be "narrowly tailored" to advance "compelling governmental interest"). . 2005See, e.g., State v. Hodge, 248 Conn. 207 , 726 A.2d 531 , 553 n. 43 (1999) (citing Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520, 531-32 , 113 S.Ct. 2217 , 124 L.Ed.2d 472 (1993)) (for purposes of free exercise challenge, law restrictive of religious practice must be "narrowly tailored" to advance "compelling governmental interest"). .	1	1
State v. Vogenthalergreen nmctapp · 1976 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998We further note that it has been held that the term "`church' as expressive of a place is not limited to the Christian religion." State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150 , 548 P.2d 112, 113 (1976). [6] We note that Wilson attempts to raise in his appellee's brief the issue of whether the special use ordinance violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment. 1998We further note that it has been held that the term "`church' as expressive of a place is not limited to the Christian religion." State v. Vogenthaler, 89 N.M. 150 , 548 P.2d 112, 113 (1976). [6] We note that Wilson attempts to raise in his appellee's brief the issue of whether the special use ordinance violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Marshall v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union green cal · 1962 2 sentences 1998The establishment of an exception to the general rule is frequently attributed to the California case of Marshall v. International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, 57 Cal.2d 781, 22 Cal.Rptr. 211 , 371 P.2d 987 (Cal.1962), in which the California Supreme Court allowed a union member to bring a tort action against the union. 1998The establishment of an exception to the general rule is frequently attributed to the California case of Marshall v. International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union, 57 Cal.2d 781, 22 Cal.Rptr. 211 , 371 P.2d 987 (Cal.1962), in which the California Supreme Court allowed a union member to bring a tort action against the union.	1	1998–1998
Weldon v. Weldon green conn · 1968 1 sentence 1996Anderson v. Zoning Commission of City of Norwalk (1968), 157 Conn. 285 , 253 A.2d 16, 19 .	1	1996–1996
Anderson v. Zoning Commission green conn · 1968 1 sentence 1996Anderson v. Zoning Commission of City of Norwalk (1968), 157 Conn. 285 , 253 A.2d 16, 19 .	1	1996–1996
Lemon v. Kurtzman red scotus · 1971 2 sentences 1995Lemon, 403 U.S. at 615 , 91 S.Ct. at 2112 , 29 L.Ed.2d at 757 . -At first glance, it is apparent that no Establishment Clause violation exists here. 1995Lemon, 403 U.S. at 615 , 91 S.Ct. at 2112 , 29 L.Ed.2d at 757 . -At first glance, it is apparent that no Establishment Clause violation exists here.	1	1995–1995
O'Connor v. O'Connor green ind · 1969 2 sentences 1972For a scholarly examination of the origin of the rule see Judge Staton’s excellent dissenting opinion in Alderson v. Alderson, supra. The general application of the doctrine of estoppel as set forth in Sidebottom was somewhat limited by our decision in O’Connor v. O’Connor (1989), 253 Ind. 295 , 253 N. E. 2d 250 . 1972For a scholarly examination of the origin of the rule see Judge Staton’s excellent dissenting opinion in Alderson v. Alderson, supra. The general application of the doctrine of estoppel as set forth in Sidebottom was somewhat limited by our decision in O’Connor v. O’Connor (1989), 253 Ind. 295 , 253 N. E. 2d 250 .	1	1972–1972
Pilgrim Holiness Church-Illinois District v. First Pilgrim Holiness Church green illappct · 1999 1 sentence 1971Consistent with the admonition to religious organizations in the Hull case, to structure their relationships “so as not to require the civil courts to resolve ecclesiastical questions.” the church in Pilgrim Holiness Ch. v. First Pilgrim Holiness Ch. (1969), 115 Ill.	1	1971–1971
Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney neutral ind · 1941 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942
Board of Comm. Elkhart County v. Werker green indctapp · 1934 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942
Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels green indctapp · 1941 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942
Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson neutral indctapp · 1934 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942
Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. neutral indctapp · 1938 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942
Montgomery v. Brown neutral indctapp · 1940 1 sentence 1942Examples of such cases in this State are: Lasear, Inc. v. Anderson (1934), 99 Ind. App. 428 , 192 N. E. 762 ; Hunt v. Gaseteria, Inc. (1938), 105 Ind. App. 197 , 12 N. E. (2d) 992; Montgomery v. Brown (1941), 109 Ind. App. 95 , 27 N. E. (2d) 884; Odd Fellows Cemetery v. Daniels (1941), 109 Ind. App. 127 , 33 N. E. (2d) 357; Soetje & Arnold, Inc. v. Basney (1941), 218 Ind. 538 , 34 N. E. (2d) 26.	1	1942–1942

Where else courts name it

CA 89 (1921–2025) NY 53 (1861–2026) FL 43 (1938–2026) OH 42 (1953–2025) WA 42 (1895–2026) MI 39 (1909–2020) IL 39 (1887–2021) PA 39 (1917–2024) NJ 37 (1897–2019) WI 31 (1844–2020) MA 29 (1910–2018) TX 28 (1912–2023) MD 24 (1914–2023) CO 24 (1892–2015) CT 22 (1923–2025) OR 22 (1895–2025) MN 17 (1926–2016) AL 16 (1868–2015) AR 15 (1908–2021) OK 14 (1913–2024) IA 13 (1877–2018) NM 12 (1888–2015) LA 12 (1917–2000) TN 12 (1917–2013) GA 11 (1925–2023) NE 10 (1886–2003) AZ 10 (1960–2016) MO 10 (1906–2011) KS 10 (1901–1996) KY 9 (1899–2023) MS 8 (1950–2005) UT 8 (1986–2022) IN 8 (1942–2005) VA 8 (1925–2015) ME 7 (1844–2006) ID 7 (1890–1996) NC 7 (1874–2011) MT 6 (1878–2012) SC 5 (1846–2021) VT 5 (1979–2017) DC 5 (1982–1997) HI 5 (1987–2020) ND 4 (1895–1986) AK 4 (1979–2022) NV 4 (1959–2022) WV 4 (1950–2014) NH 4 (1967–1995) RI 2 (1919–1980) DE 2 (1974–1990) PR 2 (1942–1956)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check