green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.7 score
“memorandum of law" filed subsequent to court order treated as a "motion under rule 2-535(a) to revise the judgment”
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kim v. Comptroller of Treasury
memorandum of law" filed subsequent to court order treated as a "motion under rule 2-535(a) to revise the judgment
cited
Cited "see"
Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.
See Dieter v. B&H Indus. of Southwest Fla., Inc., 880 F.2d 322 , 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Casey v. Grossman
See Gluckstem v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 650 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Pickett v. Noba, Inc.
See Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Pickett v. Noba, Inc.
See Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Sager v. Maass
See Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825 , 832 n. 13 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Fila U.S.A., Inc. v. Nam Joo Kim
See Dieter v. B & H Industries of Southwest Florida, Inc., 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dive N' Surf, Inc. v. Anselowitz
Similarly, trademark plaintiffs are entitled to full costs of the litigation, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, as pertains to Count II of the complaint because the affidavits of the former Promo Graphics employees establish that defendant’s infringement was malicious, fraudulent, deliberate and wilful. 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (a); accord Dieter v. B & H Indus., 880 F.2d 322 , 329 (11th Cir.1989), cert denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990) (holding that a trademark infringement case is “exceptional” and justifies the award of reasonable a attorney’s fee if defe…
cited
Cited "see"
Birthright v. Birthright, Inc.
See Dieter v. B & H Indus., Inc., 880 F.2d 322 , 329 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burger King Corp. v. Majeed
See Dieter v. B & H Industries, 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990); AmBrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc., 812 F.2d 1531, 1538 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1041 , 107 S.Ct. 1983 , 95 L.Ed.2d 822 (1987); Jaguar Cars Ltd. v. Skandrani, 771 F.Supp. 1178, 1183 (S.D.Fla.1991). 11.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles C. Coogan v. Gary McCaughtry
See Chambers v. Armontrout, 885 F.2d 1318, 1322-23 (8th Cir.1989), reaff'd on rehearing, 907 F.2d 825 (8th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990) (counsel ineffective for failure to call witnesses to support only plausible defense of self-defense); Rogers v. Israel, 746 F.2d 1288 (7th Cir.1984) (counsel had duty to ask an expert whether defendant would have been immediately incapacitated by his wound in order to rebut the state’s expert).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Perry Anthony Cribbs v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tyrone Chalmers v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
David Keen v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jon Hall v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Campbell v. Cushwa
The Court reiterated, however, that “the ex post facto clauses are inapplicable to ‘parole guidelines [that] “do not have the force and effect of law” but are merely “policies] ... that show how ... discretion is likely to be exercised.” ’ ” Id. (citations omitted); see Herrera v. State, 357 Md. 186, 188 , 742 A.2d 517 (1999); State v. Kanaras, 357 Md. 170, 184-85 , 742 A.2d 508 (1999); see also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 671-72 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruby v. State
See also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 662 , 574 A.2d 898, 912 (describing the Post Conviction Procedure Act as a statutory *107 substitute, under most circumstances, for the collateral common law remedies of habeas corpus and writ of error coram nobis), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990); Jones, 114 Md.App. at 478 , 691 A.2d at 232 (explaining that a “writ of error coram nobis remains available ... as a remedy to mount a collateral attack upon a prior conviction or sentence.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrison v. State
See also Gluckstern v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634, 663-64 , 574 A.2d 898, 912 , cert. denied, Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990); Shoemaker, 225 Md. 639 , 171 A.2d 468 ; Lloyd, 217 Md. at 670 , 143 A.2d at 484-85 . 5 In Shoemaker , we described the circumstances leading to the post conviction court’s grant of the defendant’s request for a belated appeal: The accused’s uncle had furnished funds to pay the lawyer who represented him.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland House of Correction v. Fields
See, e.g., Gluckstem v. Sutton, 319 Md. 634 , 574 A.2d 898 , cert. denied sub nom Henneberry v. Sutton, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Burger King Corp. v. Agad
See, e.g., the factors set forth in Dieter v. B & H Industries of Southwest Florida, Inc., 880 F.2d 322, 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990); Conagra, Inc. v. Singleton, 743 F.2d 1508, 1512 (11th Cir.1984); Burger King Corporation v. Mason, 710 F.2d 1480 , 1491-92 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1102 , 104 S.Ct. 1599 , 80 L.Ed.2d 130 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Chambers
Compare Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 331 (1990), aff'd 885 F.2d 1318 (8th Cir.1989) (counsel was ineffective by conducting no interviews with Jones).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Andre Bland v. State of Tennessee
App. 1991); see also Chambers v. Armontrout, 907 F.2d 825, 832 (8th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 950 , 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Victor Decosta v. Viacom International, Inc.
See, e.g., Dieter v. B & H Indus. of Southwest Florida, 880 F.2d 322 , 326 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 369 , 112 L.Ed.2d 332 (1990); WCVB-TV, 926 F.2d at 45 ; Astra Pharmaceutical Prods., Inc. v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 718 F.2d 1201, 1205, 1209 (1st Cir.1983); Pignons S.A. de Mecanique v. Polaroid Corp., 657 F.2d 482, 486-87 (1st Cir.1981); W.W.W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DeCosta v. Viacom International
See, e.g., ___ ____ Dieter v. B & H Indus. of Southwest Florida, 880 F.2d 322 , ______ __________________________________ 326 (11th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 369 (1990); ____________ WCVB-TV, 926 F.2d at 45 ; Astra Pharmaceutical Prods., Inc. _______ __________________________________ v. Beckman Instruments, Inc., 718 F.2d 1201, 1205, 1209 (1st _________________________ Cir. 1983); Pignons S.A. de Mecanique v. Polaroid Corp., 657 _________________________ ______________ F.2d 482, 486-87 (1st Cir. 1981); W.W.W.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James A. LEWIS, Trustee for Joseph M. Eaton Builders, Inc.
v.
Thomas J. DIETHORN, et ux.
v.
Thomas J. DIETHORN, et ux.
No. 89-1738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1990.
111 S. Ct. 369
Cited by 134 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Maryland (1)
Case below, Bkrtcy., 93 B.R. 428; D.C., 109 B.R. 685; 893 F.2d 648.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Denied.
Justice WHITE would grant certiorari.