State v. Lindstrom, 704 A.2d 802 (Conn. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Lindstrom, 704 A.2d 802 (Conn. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Grenier, 739 A.2d 751 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
[o]ur Supreme Court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontationno pin page on record · 2 citing cases listed
  • State v. Grenier, 739 A.2d 751 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).published 2 cites
    ([o]ur Supreme Court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontation)
  • State v. Hawkins, 722 A.2d 278 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998).published 2 cites
    ([o]ur Supreme Court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontation)
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“our supreme court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontation”quoted beside the cite; not in this opinion · 2 citing cases listed
  • State v. Grenier, 739 A.2d 751 (Conn. App. Ct. 1999).published 2 cites
    “our supreme court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontation”
  • State v. Hawkins, 722 A.2d 278 (Conn. App. Ct. 1998).published 2 cites
    “our supreme court has held that the constancy of accusation doctrine does not violate the right to confrontation”
Other citing cases6 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
John O. Lindstrom
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 20, 1997.
Published opinion
704 A.2d 802
1997 Conn. LEXIS 468
G. Douglas Nash, public defender, and Lauren Weisfield, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 810 (AC 16023), is denied.

NORCOTT and KATZ, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.