Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Cited for
Quoted next to this citation, but not language from this opinion
“if not a ground for certification per se, certainly settlement should be a factor, and an important factor to be considered when determining certification”
- Cont'l Cas. v. Rudd, No. 95-40694 (5th Cir. July 26, 1996).published“if not a ground for certification per se, certainly settlement should be a factor, and an important factor to be considered when determining certification”
- Flanagan v. Ahearn (In re Astestos Litig.), 90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir. 1996).published“if not a ground for certification per se, certainly settlement should be a factor, and an important factor to be considered when determining certification”
- In re Asbestos Litig., 90 F.3d 963 (5th Cir. 1996).published“if not a ground for certification per se, certainly settlement should be a factor, and an important factor to be considered when determining certification”
Other citing cases
- Nelson v. Dalkon Shield Trust, No. 98-1080 (4th Cir. Aug. 31, 1998).unpublished
- United States v. Robert Peter Russell, 971 F.2d 1098 (4th Cir. 1992).published
- C & J Builders & Remodelers, LLC v. Geisenheimer, 733 A.2d 193 (Conn. 1999).published
- United States v. Mark Christopher Poe, 81 F.3d 152 (4th Cir. 1996).unpublished
- United States v. Poe, No. 94-5414 (4th Cir. Mar. 26, 1996).unpublished
- United States v. Antonio Luis Burgos, 55 F.3d 933 (4th Cir. 1995).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clardy, of the Estate of Clardy
v.
Sanders
v.
Sanders
No. 89-440.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 6, 1989.
Published opinion
493 U.S. 959
Published
Sup. Ct. Ala. Certiorari denied. Justice White would grant certiorari.