Plute v. State (2003)
green
· 13 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 9 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Plute v. State (2011)
Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
green
Amanda Lee Hobgood v. State of Florida (2015)
See Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context [i.e., where the defen *844 dant’s original sentence was illegal] without violating double jeopardy.”); State v. Swider, 799 So.2d 388, 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“A trial court may vacate an illegal sentence and impose a harsher sentence without violating the defendant’s double jeopardy rights.”).
“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context [i.e., where the defen *844 dant’s original sentence was illegal] without violating double jeopardy.”
green
Amanda Lee Hobgood v. State (2015)
See Plute v. State, 835 So. 2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context [i.e., where the defendant’s original sentence was illegal] without violating double jeopardy.”); State v. Swider, 799 So. 2d 388, 391 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (“A trial court may vacate an illegal sentence and impose a harsher sentence without violating the defendant’s double jeopardy rights.”).
“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context [i.e., where the defendant’s original sentence was illegal] without violating double jeopardy.”
green
Clark v. State (2011)
Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context without violating double jeopardy.”); see also Peterson v. State, 974 So.2d 1082, 1084 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (same).
“It is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing in such a context without violating double jeopardy.”
green
Peterson v. State (2007)
It follows that the trial court could "resentence [her] `in accordance with the valid laws in effect' on the date that the defendant committed the relevant offense." Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (quoting Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620, 630-31 (Fla.2000)).
quoting Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620, 630-31 (Fla.2000)
green
PHILIP WALLACE STAUDERMAN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2018)
See Plute v. State, 835 So. 2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (explaining that after the circuit court granted Plute's rule 3.800(a) motion, the court was free to resentence Plute as a habitual offender despite having originally sentenced him under the sentencing guidelines because when the original sentence is illegal, "[i]t is well established that a harsher sentence may be imposed on resentencing . . . without violating double jeopardy"); Harris v. State, 624 So. 2d 279, 280…
explaining that after the circuit court granted Plute's rule 3.800(a
green
Hankins v. State (2010)
See Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).
green
Harder v. State (2009)
See Burrel v. State, 993 So.2d 998, 999 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (finding that section 948.30, Florida Statutes (2006), did not apply where the offense was committed prior to the statute’s effective date); see also Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (finding that trial courts should conduct resentencing according to the laws in effect on the date that the defendant committed the relevant offense).
finding that trial courts should conduct resentencing according to the laws in effect on the date that the defendant committed the relevant offense
green
Badia v. State (2006)
See Plute v. State, 835 So.2d 368 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).