Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cooper v. Stategreen2 sentences2009In Cooper v. State, 761 N.E.2d 900 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), we stated that the proper foundation for the admission of an HGN test consists of describing the officer's education and experience in administering the test and showing that the procedure was properly administered. 2009In Cooper v. State, 761 N.E.2d 900 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), we stated that the proper foundation for the admission of an HGN test consists of describing the officer's education and experience in administering the test and showing that the procedure was properly administered. | 1 | 3 |
Combs v. Stategreen1 sentence2009Combs v. State, 895 N.E.2d 1252, 1255 (Ind.Ct.App.2008). | 1 | 1 |
O'BANION v. Stategreen2 sentences2009This court has commented that "the thrust of [the HGN test] is for the tester to move an object in a certain fashion in front of the driver and watch the driver's eyeball to detect involuntary jerking." O'Banion, 789 N.E.2d at 519 (internal quotation omitted). 2009This court has commented that "the thrust of [the HGN test] is for the tester to move an object in a certain fashion in front of the driver and watch the driver's eyeball to detect involuntary jerking." O'Banion, 789 N.E.2d at 519 (internal quotation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Moore v. State
green
2 sentences2018After those statements were made, Conlin was taken to the ambulance to be evaluated by medical personnel and then later performed the HGN test. [24] Conlin relies on Moore v. State, 723 N.E.2d 442 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000), but that case is factually distinguishable. 2018After those statements were made, Conlin was taken to the ambulance to be evaluated by medical personnel and then later performed the HGN test. [24] Conlin relies on Moore v. State, 723 N.E.2d 442 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000), but that case is factually distinguishable. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.