Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meyers v. Furrow Building Materialsgreen1 sentence2017See Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc. , 815 N.E.2d 522 , 529 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (plaintiff's testimony showed he was "fully aware of the risks of injury associated with his conduct" and "disregarded all warnings that were provided", including an obvious "label warning of the dangers posed by overhead power lines"), trans. denied ; Meyers , 659 N.E.2d at 1149-50 (because plaintiff had extensive knowledge of and experience using concrete and had read the multiple warnings on the bags, he was aware of the specific risk of burns from wet concrete). [31] In this case, the designated evidence does not e | 1 | 1 |
Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc.green1 sentence2017See Coffman v. PSI Energy, Inc. , 815 N.E.2d 522 , 529 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004) (plaintiff's testimony showed he was "fully aware of the risks of injury associated with his conduct" and "disregarded all warnings that were provided", including an obvious "label warning of the dangers posed by overhead power lines"), trans. denied ; Meyers , 659 N.E.2d at 1149-50 (because plaintiff had extensive knowledge of and experience using concrete and had read the multiple warnings on the bags, he was aware of the specific risk of burns from wet concrete). [31] In this case, the designated evidence does not e | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Services, P.C.
green
2 sentences2012Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Servs., P.C. 864 N.E.2d 1093 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007). 2012Palmer v. Comprehensive Neurologic Servs., P.C. 864 N.E.2d 1093 (Ind.Ct.App.2007). | 2 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Evans
green
1 sentence2008Evans, 810 N.E.2d at 337 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Melvin Meffery Wade v. Arthur Calderon, Warden of San Quentin Attorney General of California
green
1 sentence1999In Wade , the court found multiple factors that together made counsel ineffective during the penalty phase, among them counsel’s closing argument. 29 F.3d at 1323-25 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.