Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. Nugent Sand Co.green1 sentence2017As the Barnette court observed, “ ‘[w]here an administrative remedy is readily available, filing a declaratory judgment action is not a suitable alternative.’” Barnette, 15 N.E.3d at 9 (quoting Carter v. Nugent Sand Co., 925 N.E.2d 356, 360 (Ind. 2010)). | 1 | 1 |
Hartig v. Stratmangreen1 sentence2015Hartig v. Stratman, 760 N.E.2d 668, 671 (Ind. Ct. App. 2002), trans. denied. [10] Moreover, the trial court’s order here was simply a general denial of the Owners’ motion in its entirety. | 1 | 1 |
Timothy F. Kelly and Assoc. v. Ill. Farmers Ins. Co.green1 sentence2001Timothy F. Kelly & Assocs. v. Illinois Farmers Ins., Co., 640 N.E.2d 82, 85-86 (Ind.Ct.App.1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Weaver v. American Oil Company
green
2 sentences2018We note that relative bargaining power, and not conspicuousness of contract terms, is the relevant consideration when determining whether a contract was entered into knowingly and willingly, see Weaver , 257 Ind. at 465 , 276 N.E.2d at 148 , and we are unpersuaded by the Owners' claim that they were unaware of the exculpatory clause contained in the Covenants and Restrictions. 2018We note that relative bargaining power, and not conspicuousness of contract terms, is the relevant consideration when determining whether a contract was entered into knowingly and willingly, see Weaver , 257 Ind. at 465 , 276 N.E.2d at 148 , and we are unpersuaded by the Owners' claim that they were unaware of the exculpatory clause contained in the Covenants and Restrictions. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Fresh Cut, Inc. v. Fazli
green
2 sentences2018Id. (citing Fresh Cut , 650 N.E.2d at 1130 ). [19] Considering the above factors, 4 we find no compelling reason to declare the exculpatory clause void. 5 This is based in large part on two overarching observations that we have already touched upon. 2018Id. (citing Fresh Cut , 650 N.E.2d at 1130 ). [19] Considering the above factors, 4 we find no compelling reason to declare the exculpatory clause void. 5 This is based in large part on two overarching observations that we have already touched upon. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Trimble v. Ameritech Publishing, Inc.
green
2 sentences2018Id. (citing Fresh Cut , 650 N.E.2d at 1130 ). [19] Considering the above factors, 4 we find no compelling reason to declare the exculpatory clause void. 5 This is based in large part on two overarching observations that we have already touched upon. 2018Id. (citing Fresh Cut , 650 N.E.2d at 1130 ). [19] Considering the above factors, 4 we find no compelling reason to declare the exculpatory clause void. 5 This is based in large part on two overarching observations that we have already touched upon. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Barnette v. US Architects, LLP
green
1 sentence2017As the Barnette court observed, “ ‘[w]here an administrative remedy is readily available, filing a declaratory judgment action is not a suitable alternative.’” Barnette, 15 N.E.3d at 9 (quoting Carter v. Nugent Sand Co., 925 N.E.2d 356, 360 (Ind. 2010)). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Johnson v. Celebration Fireworks, Inc.
green
1 sentence2017To the extent that Plaintiff Owners’ claim is that they are sure the BZA would rule against them, “[T]he mere fact that an administrative agency might refuse to provide the relief requested does not amount to futility.” Johnson, 829 N.E.2d at 984 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Bell v. State
neutral
1 sentence1969Furnace v. State (1899), 153 Ind. 93 , 54 N. E. 441 ; Bell v. State (1873), 42 Ind. 335 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Furnace v. State
green
2 sentences1969Furnace v. State (1899), 153 Ind. 93 , 54 N. E. 441 ; Bell v. State (1873), 42 Ind. 335 . 1969Furnace v. State (1899), 153 Ind. 93 , 54 N. E. 441 ; Bell v. State (1873), 42 Ind. 335 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.