Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Antonio Hughley v. State of Indiana, The Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County, and The Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Departmentgreen2 sentences2016The Court of Appeals ventured that “Indiana’s ‘heightened’ summary judgment standard, discussed in Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000, 1003 (Ind.2014), under which the moving party must negate an opponent’s claim, does not apply to a Title VII claim.” Gaff, 45 N.E.3d at 465 n. 9. 2015Thus, Indiana’s “heightened” summary judgment standard, discussed in Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000, 1003 (Ind.2014), under which the moving party must negate an opponent's claim, does not apply to a Title VII claim. | 2 | 2 |
Endres v. Indiana State Policegreen1 sentence2004See Endres, 794 N.E.2d at 1094 , citing City of Anderson v. Davis, 743 N.E.2d 359, 865-66 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied, and Men-denhall v. City of Indianapolis 717 N.E.2d 1218, 1225 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. demied. | 1 | 1 |
City of Anderson v. Davisgreen1 sentence2004See Endres, 794 N.E.2d at 1094 , citing City of Anderson v. Davis, 743 N.E.2d 359, 865-66 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied, and Men-denhall v. City of Indianapolis 717 N.E.2d 1218, 1225 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. demied. | 1 | 1 |
Mendenhall v. City of Indianapolisgreen1 sentence2004See Endres, 794 N.E.2d at 1094 , citing City of Anderson v. Davis, 743 N.E.2d 359, 865-66 (Ind.Ct.App.2001), trans. denied, and Men-denhall v. City of Indianapolis 717 N.E.2d 1218, 1225 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. demied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Adam Gaff v. Indiana-Purdue University of Fort Wayne
green
1 sentence2016The Court of Appeals ventured that “Indiana’s ‘heightened’ summary judgment standard, discussed in Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000, 1003 (Ind.2014), under which the moving party must negate an opponent’s claim, does not apply to a Title VII claim.” Gaff, 45 N.E.3d at 465 n. 9. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Indiana Civil Rights Commission v. Culver Educational Foundation
green
1 sentence2015Culver, 535 N.E.2d at 115 , 10 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Mary Burke Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tompkins v. Texas
green
2 sentences1993Id. at 767 , 109 S.Ct. at 2187 . 1993Id. at 767 , 109 S.Ct. at 2187 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Martin v. Wilks
red
2 sentences1993Id. at 767 , 109 S.Ct. at 2187 . 1993Id. at 767 , 109 S.Ct. at 2187 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.