5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dickerson v. Saint Luke's South Hospital, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024PIK Civ. 4th 105.04, Comment." Dickerson v. Saint Luke's South Hospital, Inc., 51 Kan. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
DiPietro v. Cessna Aircraft Co.
green
1 sentence2017But our Court of Appeals rejected its admissibility for that purpose in DiPietro v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 28 Kan. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Becker v. Port Dock Four, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990App. 384 , 752 P.2d 1235 (1988), the Oregon Court of Appeals concluded that a comparative fault defense should be available in legal malpractice cases. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Mathis v. TG & Y
green
1 sentence1988After reviewing the comparative fault doctrine and its leading Kansas cases, a unanimous court concluded: “The case must also be controlled by Mathis v. TG&Y, 242 Kan. 789, 751 P.2d *92 136 (1988). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Thomas Ex Rel. Thomas v. Board of Township Trustees
green
2 sentences1981(See Thomas v. Board of Trustees of Salem Township, 224 Kan. 539 , Syl. ¶ 2, 582 P.2d 271 [1978], holding such advice proper.) Without an objection in the record, we might well be justified in refusing to consider the point. 1981(See Thomas v. Board of Trustees of Salem Township, 224 Kan. 539 , Syl. ¶ 2, 582 P.2d 271 [1978], holding such advice proper.) Without an objection in the record, we might well be justified in refusing to consider the point. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.