Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hayesgreen2 sentences2025See Hayes, 57 Kan. App. 2d at 900 . 2025See Hayes, 57 Kan. App. 2d at 900 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Campbellgreen2 sentences2018See 307 Kan. at 137 , 407 P.3d 240 . 2018See 307 Kan. at 137 , 407 P.3d 240 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2017See State v. Williams, 303 Kan. 585, 595 , 363 P.3d 1101 (2016) (affirming judgment as right for the wrong reason). 2017See State v. Williams, 303 Kan. 585, 595 , 363 P.3d 1101 (2016) (affirming judgment as right for the wrong reason). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gould
green
2 sentences2021Second, Hayes' motion fails because Gould, 271 Kan. at 414 , directly contradicts his argument—a point Hayes acknowledges. 2021Second, Hayes' motion fails because Gould, 271 Kan. at 414 , directly contradicts his argument—a point Hayes acknowledges. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Dupree
green
1 sentence2020Dupree, 304 Kan. at 62 . 15 Hayes' objection was timely as to two witnesses. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Hayes v. State
green
2 sentences2008Because Hayes filed his motion in November 2003 before such a 1-year grace period would have expired in July 2004, the Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal of Hayes’ motion and remanded the matter for further proceedings. 34 Kan. 2008Without addressing whether manifest injustice prevented the dismissal of Hayes’ motion, the Hayes court held that the 1-year limitations period in K.S.A. 60-1507(f)(1) must allow a 1-year period from the date the amendment became effective for all preexisting claims. 34 Kan. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.