Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Whitlow v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2021“When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we utilize a clear error standard of review for factual findings and a de novo standard of review for conclusions of law.” Sykes v. Commonwealth, 453 S.W.3d 722, 724 (Ky. 2015) (quotations and citation omitted). 11 “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution guarantee the individual right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” Whitlow v. Commonwealth, 575 S.W.3d 663, 669 (Ky. 2019).4 “Generally, warrantless searches are unreasonable unless the search falls under 2021“When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we utilize a clear error standard of review for factual findings and a de novo standard of review for conclusions of law.” Sykes v. Commonwealth, 453 S.W.3d 722, 724 (Ky. 2015) (quotations and citation omitted). 11 “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution guarantee the individual right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” Whitlow v. Commonwealth, 575 S.W.3d 663, 669 (Ky. 2019).4 “Generally, warrantless searches are unreasonable unless the search falls under | 1 | 1 |
Stephen Sykes v. Commonwealth of Kentuckygreen1 sentence2021“When reviewing a trial court’s denial of a motion to suppress, we utilize a clear error standard of review for factual findings and a de novo standard of review for conclusions of law.” Sykes v. Commonwealth, 453 S.W.3d 722, 724 (Ky. 2015) (quotations and citation omitted). 11 “The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 10 of the Kentucky Constitution guarantee the individual right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures.” Whitlow v. Commonwealth, 575 S.W.3d 663, 669 (Ky. 2019).4 “Generally, warrantless searches are unreasonable unless the search falls under | 1 | 1 |
Joshua Hammond v. Commonwealth of Kentuckygreen1 sentence2021Hammond v. Commonwealth, 504 S.W.3d 44, 54 (Ky. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Benhamgreen2 sentences2001See Commonwealth v. Benham, Ky., 816 S.W.2d 186 (1991). 2001See Commonwealth v. Benham, Ky., 816 S.W.2d 186 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fraser v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2025We affirmed the trial court in an unpublished opinion.3 However, on April 20, 2021, the Kentucky Supreme Court vacated the opinion of the Court of Appeals and ordered the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on Hayes’s issues pursuant to Fraser v. Commonwealth, 59 S.W.3d 448 (Ky. 2001). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2025In its order denying Hayes’s motion, the trial court found that Hayes’s counsel “was not ineffective for failing to present an EED defense under Strickland’s two-part test.” (R. at 923.) Although “strategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable[,]” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S. Ct. at 2066 , the trial court correctly recognized that “[d]eficiency occurs whenever counsel makes a strategic decision that is objectively unreasonable.” (R. at 923.) Nonetheless, the trial court ruled that it was not unreasonable 2025In its order denying Hayes’s motion, the trial court found that Hayes’s counsel “was not ineffective for failing to present an EED defense under Strickland’s two-part test.” (R. at 923.) Although “strategic choices made after thorough investigation of law and facts relevant to plausible options are virtually unchallengeable[,]” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 690 , 104 S. Ct. at 2066 , the trial court correctly recognized that “[d]eficiency occurs whenever counsel makes a strategic decision that is objectively unreasonable.” (R. at 923.) Nonetheless, the trial court ruled that it was not unreasonable | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Louisville Peterbilt, Inc. v. Cox
green
1 sentence2009On May 13, 2004, the case of Louisville Peterbilt, Inc. v. Cox, 132 S.W.3d 850 (Ky.2004), became final. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Hayes v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2003Hayes v. Commonwealth, Ky., 58 S.W.3d 879 (2001). 2003Hayes v. Commonwealth, Ky., 58 S.W.3d 879 (2001). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.