mere fact hearing in Kansas

2022Without much more, a petition for habeas corpus alleging procedural errors at a prison disciplinary hearing must fail.'" 279 Kan. at 855-56 .

2020Without much more, a petition for habeas 7 corpus alleging procedural errors at a prison disciplinary hearing must fail.'" Hogue v. Bruce, 279 Kan. 848, 855-56 , 113 P.3d 234 (2005).

2005App. 2d 803, 811 , 937 P.2d 16 , rev. denied 262 Kan. 959 , cert. denied 522 U.S. 958 (1997), the Court of Appeals held: “The mere fact that a hearing officer in a prison discipline case has not followed DOC procedural regulations does not of itself violate fundamental fairness that *856 rises to an unconstitutional level.

2005App. 2d 803, 811 , 937 P.2d 16 , rev. denied 262 Kan. 959 , cert. denied 522 U.S. 958 (1997), the Court of Appeals held: “The mere fact that a hearing officer in a prison discipline case has not followed DOC procedural regulations does not of itself violate fundamental fairness that *856 rises to an unconstitutional level.

1897In Zimmerman v. Knox, 34 Kan. 252 , occurs the following language: “ It is true that the giving of an instruction upon an abstract proposition of law, and which is irrelevant to the issues in the case, is not reversible error, unless it may be fairly inferred that the jury were misled thereby.” In the case of Burton v. Boyd, 7 Kan. 17 , it is said that unless it may be made reasonably to appear that the jury were misled by the giving of an inapplicable instruction the judgment will not be reversed.