7 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1937–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Polygon Corp. v. City of Seattlegreen2 sentences2018Hornbaker, 98 Wn.2d at 660 (citing Polygon Corp. v. City of Seattle, 90 Wn.2d 59, 67-68 , 578 P.2d 1309 (1978)). 2018Hornbaker, 98 Wn.2d at 660 (citing Polygon Corp. v. City of Seattle, 90 Wn.2d 59, 67-68 , 578 P.2d 1309 (1978)). | 2 | 3 |
Jones v. City of Seattlegreen2 sentences2014See Jones v. City of Seattle, 179 Wn.2d 322, 345 , 314 P.3d 380 (2014) (willfulness is not established by the mere fact of violation of a court order or discovery rule, "[sjomething more is needed.") However, the findings of substantial prejudice and consideration of lesser sanctions do not demonstrate that the court imposed default as a sanction following a "meaningful inquiry" into the effect of Northwest's conduct and whether any other sanction could compensate La Rosa. 2014See Jones v. City of Seattle, 179 Wn.2d 322, 345 , 314 P.3d 380 (2014) (willfulness is not established by the mere fact of violation of a court order or discovery rule, "[sjomething more is needed.") However, the findings of substantial prejudice and consideration of lesser sanctions do not demonstrate that the court imposed default as a sanction following a "meaningful inquiry" into the effect of Northwest's conduct and whether any other sanction could compensate La Rosa. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Legacy Roofing, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2023Legacy argued that it was “impossible” to show effective enforcement of its safety program because the “Board assumed that the mere fact of the violation showed that Legacy’s program was not effective in practice.” Id. at 367 . 2023Three Tree’s strict liability argument is akin to the argument rejected in Legacy Roofing, namely that the Board had assumed “the mere fact of the violation showed that Legacy’s program was not effective in practice.” Legacy Roofing, 129 Wn. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Harris v. Hornbaker
green
1 sentence2018Hornbaker, 98 Wn.2d at 660 (citing Polygon Corp. v. City of Seattle, 90 Wn.2d 59, 67-68 , 578 P.2d 1309 (1978)). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
King Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. Lane
green
1 sentence1996King Aircraft Sales, Inc. v. Lane, 68 Wn. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Gabrielsen v. City of Seattle
neutral
2 sentences1937Gabrielsen v. Seattle, 150 Wash. 157 , 272 Pac. 723 , 63 A. L. 1937Gabrielsen v. Seattle, 150 Wash. 157 , 272 Pac. 723 , 63 A. L. | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.