results of a blood test (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

results of a blood test in Kansas

5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Perkins green
kan · 2019
2 sentences

2020SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Applying State v. Perkins, 310 Kan. 764 , 449 P.3d 756 (2019), to the circumstances of this case, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies and allowed the district court to consider the results of a blood test for blood alcohol content even though the Kansas Supreme Court would later hold that K.S.A. 2015 Supp. 8-1025 was unconstitutional.

2020SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Applying State v. Perkins, 310 Kan. 764 , 449 P.3d 756 (2019), to the circumstances of this case, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies and allowed the district court to consider the results of a blood test for blood alcohol content even though the Kansas Supreme Court would later hold that K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 8-1025 was unconstitutional.

22020–2020
In Re Marriage of Ross green
kan · 1989
2 sentences

1995In May 1994, Breeden’s attorney filed a “Motion for Best Interests of the Child Hearing.” The motion contended that In re Marriage of Ross, 245 Kan. 591 , 783 P.2d 331 (1989), required an evidentiary hearing to determine whether establishing paternity is in the best interests of the child and prohibited considering the results of a blood test until such a determination was made.

1995In May 1994, Breeden’s attorney filed a “Motion for Best Interests of the Child Hearing.” The motion contended that In re Marriage of Ross, 245 Kan. 591 , 783 P.2d 331 (1989), required an evidentiary hearing to determine whether establishing paternity is in the best interests of the child and prohibited considering the results of a blood test until such a determination was made.

11995–1995
State v. Williams green
kanctapp · 1980
1 sentence

1984App. 2d 651 , 610 P.2d 111 (1980), which determined an interlocutory appeal by the State pursuant to K.S.A. 22-3603 from the order of a district court suppressing the results of a blood test.

11984–1984
Williams v. Hendrickson green
kan · 1962
2 sentences

1969(Williams v. Hendrickson, 189 Kan. 673, 676 , 371 P. 2d 188 .) Color slides or reproductions showing the victim’s body used by the coroner to demonstrate to the jury the depth of the wounds and type of blow inflicting them are admissible in evidence.

1969(Williams v. Hendrickson, 189 Kan. 673, 676 , 371 P. 2d 188 .) Color slides or reproductions showing the victim’s body used by the coroner to demonstrate to the jury the depth of the wounds and type of blow inflicting them are admissible in evidence.

11969–1969
Malone v. New York Life Insurance neutral
kan · 1938
2 sentences

1969Co., 148 Kan. 555, 559 , 83 P. 2d 639 .) The results of a blood test, if properly obtained and accurately identified, are admissible in a case although the blood sample itself is not in evidence.

1969Co., 148 Kan. 555, 559 , 83 P. 2d 639 .) The results of a blood test, if properly obtained and accurately identified, are admissible in a case although the blood sample itself is not in evidence.

11969–1969

Where else courts name it

TX 34 (1961–2024) PA 17 (1974–2024) IL 16 (1960–2023) NY 15 (1960–2022) IA 7 (1972–2024) FL 6 (1979–2007) ME 6 (1978–2022) CA 6 (1966–2014) MN 5 (1991–2016) VA 5 (1971–2009) KS 5 (1969–2020) GA 4 (1963–2009) KY 4 (1972–2021) NE 4 (1996–2023) AK 3 (1995–2012) MO 3 (1985–2011) WI 3 (1984–2017) MS 3 (1987–2008) NC 3 (1956–1992) ND 3 (1985–2017) OK 3 (1965–1980) MI 3 (1979–1987) OH 2 (2004–2018) DE 2 (1991–2021) WV 2 (2020–2021) SD 2 (1966–1976) RI 2 (1998–2000) IN 2 (1984–2012) LA 2 (1987–1989) NM 2 (1996–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check