results of a blood test (California) · Go Syfert
← California issues

results of a blood test in California

6 California opinions name it 1 courts 1966–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by California courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (13)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Duroncelaygreen
cal · 1957 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770-771 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]), as establishing such ‘emergency’ and ‘exceptional circumstances’ as would justify the officer’s conduct in the absence of a warrant, consent or arrest.” Neither does Malloy v. Hogan, supra, 378 U.S. 1 , detract from the opinions of Duroncelay, supra, and Haeussler, supra, that the admission of evidence of the results of a blood test in the absence of defendant’s consent did not violate his privilege against self-incrimination because the privilege relates only to testimonial compulsion.

1966(People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770-771 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]), as establishing such ‘emergency’ and ‘exceptional circumstances’ as would justify the officer’s conduct in the absence of a warrant, consent or arrest.” Neither does Malloy v. Hogan, supra, 378 U.S. 1 , detract from the opinions of Duroncelay, supra, and Haeussler, supra, that the admission of evidence of the results of a blood test in the absence of defendant’s consent did not violate his privilege against self-incrimination because the privilege relates only to testimonial compulsion.

22
People v. Haeusslergreen
cal · 1953 · cited in 2 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

12
City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Courtgreen
cal · 1951 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1968–1968
2 sentences

1968The privilege here asserted by defendant is predicated upon considerations precluding “the humiliation of the patient that might follow disclosure of his ailments.” (City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ].) Yet had defendant, when removed from the scene by ambulance to Community Hospital for medical care and treatment for his own injuries, been so unfortunate as to have been arrested for drunk driving by an alert law enforcement officer who requested the doctor treating, or a nurse attending him in the hospital to draw a blood sa

1968The privilege here asserted by defendant is predicated upon considerations precluding “the humiliation of the patient that might follow disclosure of his ailments.” (City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court, 37 Cal.2d 227, 232 [ 231 P.2d 26 , 25 A.L.R.2d 1418 ].) Yet had defendant, when removed from the scene by ambulance to Community Hospital for medical care and treatment for his own injuries, been so unfortunate as to have been arrested for drunk driving by an alert law enforcement officer who requested the doctor treating, or a nurse attending him in the hospital to draw a blood sa

11
People v. Packgreen
calctapp · 1962 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
Vasquez v. Superior Courtgreen
calctapp · 1962 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Lopezgreen
cal · 1963 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Conternogreen
calctapp · 1959 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Trujillogreen
cal · 1948 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Bassgreen
calctapp · 1963 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Kempgreen
cal · 1961 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Knoxgreen
calctapp · 1960 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Hubergreen
calctapp · 1965 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11
People v. Tahtinengreen
calctapp · 1962 · cited in 1 California opinions naming this issue, 1966–1966
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in California. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (7)

CaseCitedYears
Missouri v. McNeely green
scotus · 2013
2 sentences

2014Relying on the recent decision in Missouri v. McNeely (2013) ___ U.S. ___ [ 133 S.Ct. 1552 , 185 L.Ed.2d 696 ] (McNeely), defendant argues the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the results of a blood test because his blood was drawn without a warrant.

2014Relying on the recent decision in Missouri v. McNeely (2013) ___ U.S. ___ [ 133 S.Ct. 1552 , 185 L.Ed.2d 696 ] (McNeely), defendant argues the court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress the results of a blood test because his blood was drawn without a warrant.

12014–2014
Fisk v. Department of Motor Vehicles green
calctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1992(Snelgrove, supra, 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 ; Fisk, supra, 127 Cal.App.3d at p. 77 .) Snelgrove specifically noted that the statement did not contain hearsay except for the driver’s own admissions. ( 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 .) In the present case, by contrast, the officer’s statement reports the results of a blood test not performed by the officer and so not within the officer’s personal knowledge.

11992–1992
Snelgrove v. Department of Motor Vehicles green
calctapp · 1987
2 sentences

1992(Snelgrove, supra, 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 ; Fisk, supra, 127 Cal.App.3d at p. 77 .) Snelgrove specifically noted that the statement did not contain hearsay except for the driver’s own admissions. ( 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 .) In the present case, by contrast, the officer’s statement reports the results of a blood test not performed by the officer and so not within the officer’s personal knowledge.

1992(Snelgrove, supra, 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 ; Fisk, supra, 127 Cal.App.3d at p. 77 .) Snelgrove specifically noted that the statement did not contain hearsay except for the driver’s own admissions. ( 194 Cal.App.3d at p. 1375 .) In the present case, by contrast, the officer’s statement reports the results of a blood test not performed by the officer and so not within the officer’s personal knowledge.

11992–1992
Jackson v. Jackson green
cal · 1967
2 sentences

1970Morgan has mistakenly placed reliance on Jackson v. Jackson, 67 Cal.2d 245 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 430 P.2d 289 ], which concerned a period of marital cohabitation of about four days’ duration where the results of a blood test were held to be permissible evidence.

1970Morgan has mistakenly placed reliance on Jackson v. Jackson, 67 Cal.2d 245 [ 60 Cal.Rptr. 649 , 430 P.2d 289 ], which concerned a period of marital cohabitation of about four days’ duration where the results of a blood test were held to be permissible evidence.

11970–1970
Rochin v. California green
scotus · 1952
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11966–1966
Breithaupt v. Abram green
scotus · 1957
2 sentences

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

1966(Blood tests: Breithaupt v. Abram, 352 U.S. 432 [ 77 S.Ct. 408 , 1 L.Ed.2d 448 ]; People v. Haeussler, 41 Cal.2d 252, 257-260 [ 260 P.2d 8 ]; People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]; People v. Kemp, 55 Cal.2d 458, 478 [ 11 Cal.Rptr. 361 , 359 P.2d 913 ]; People v. Knox, 178 Cal.App.2d 502, 513 [ 3 Cal.Rptr. 70 ]; People v. Pack, 199 Cal.App.2d 857, 863 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 186 ]; People v. Huber, 232 Cal.App.2d 663, 670-672 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 65 ]; saliva test: People v. Kemp, supra, p. 478 ; breath analysis test: People v. Conterno, 170 Cal.App.2d Supp. 817, 826-827 [ 339 P.2d 968 ].)

11966–1966
Malloy v. Hogan green
scotus · 1964
1 sentence

1966(People v. Duroncelay, 48 Cal.2d 766, 770-771 [ 312 P.2d 690 ]), as establishing such ‘emergency’ and ‘exceptional circumstances’ as would justify the officer’s conduct in the absence of a warrant, consent or arrest.” Neither does Malloy v. Hogan, supra, 378 U.S. 1 , detract from the opinions of Duroncelay, supra, and Haeussler, supra, that the admission of evidence of the results of a blood test in the absence of defendant’s consent did not violate his privilege against self-incrimination because the privilege relates only to testimonial compulsion.

11966–1966

Where else courts name it

TX 34 (1961–2024) PA 17 (1974–2024) IL 16 (1960–2023) NY 15 (1960–2022) IA 7 (1972–2024) FL 6 (1979–2007) ME 6 (1978–2022) CA 6 (1966–2014) MN 5 (1991–2016) VA 5 (1971–2009) KS 5 (1969–2020) GA 4 (1963–2009) KY 4 (1972–2021) NE 4 (1996–2023) AK 3 (1995–2012) MO 3 (1985–2011) WI 3 (1984–2017) MS 3 (1987–2008) NC 3 (1956–1992) ND 3 (1985–2017) OK 3 (1965–1980) MI 3 (1979–1987) OH 2 (2004–2018) DE 2 (1991–2021) WV 2 (2020–2021) SD 2 (1966–1976) RI 2 (1998–2000) IN 2 (1984–2012) LA 2 (1987–1989) NM 2 (1996–2007)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check