Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1946–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Department of Policegreen2 sentences2014A DI-2 form is "used to give an officer an informal disciplinary warning advising an officer that the officer is in violation of department regulations.” Id. 2011See Williams v. Dept. of Police, 08-0465, p. 4 (La.App. 4 Cir. 10/22/08), 996 So.2d 1142, 1144 . 2 . | 1 | 2 |
Prevost v. Rodriguezgreen1 sentence1946In State v. Young, 194 La. 1061 , 195 So. 539, 540 , we stated: “Within the meaning of the Code, a crime or offense is made known to an officer ‘having jurisdiction’ when the facts which come to his knowledge are such as to indicate to him that it is his official duty to act or to see that án investigation of the alleged crime is instituted within his jurisdiction.” And in the case' of State v. Cooley, 176 La. 448 , Í46 So. 19, 22, we stated: “The prescription, prescribed by article 8, Code Cr.Proc., begins to run from the date knowledge of the crime is made known to the judge, district attorn | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Huguet
green
1 sentence1980In State v. Huguet, 369 So.2d 1331 (La. 1979), we rejected the contention that interference with an officer's investigation is a violation of R.S. 14:108, resisting an officer. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Chambers v. Maroney
green
2 sentences1973This search and seizure satisfy the requirements of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 (1970), and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). 1973This search and seizure satisfy the requirements of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 (1970), and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Coolidge v. New Hampshire
green
2 sentences1973This search and seizure satisfy the requirements of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 (1970), and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). 1973This search and seizure satisfy the requirements of Chambers v. Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 , 90 S.Ct. 1975 , 26 L.Ed. 2d 419 (1970), and Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443 , 91 S.Ct. 2022 , 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
State v. Cooley
green
1 sentence1946In State v. Young, 194 La. 1061 , 195 So. 539, 540 , we stated: “Within the meaning of the Code, a crime or offense is made known to an officer ‘having jurisdiction’ when the facts which come to his knowledge are such as to indicate to him that it is his official duty to act or to see that án investigation of the alleged crime is instituted within his jurisdiction.” And in the case' of State v. Cooley, 176 La. 448 , Í46 So. 19, 22, we stated: “The prescription, prescribed by article 8, Code Cr.Proc., begins to run from the date knowledge of the crime is made known to the judge, district attorn | 1 | 1946–1946 |
State v. Young
neutral
2 sentences1946In State v. Young, 194 La. 1061 , 195 So. 539, 540 , we stated: “Within the meaning of the Code, a crime or offense is made known to an officer ‘having jurisdiction’ when the facts which come to his knowledge are such as to indicate to him that it is his official duty to act or to see that án investigation of the alleged crime is instituted within his jurisdiction.” And in the case' of State v. Cooley, 176 La. 448 , Í46 So. 19, 22, we stated: “The prescription, prescribed by article 8, Code Cr.Proc., begins to run from the date knowledge of the crime is made known to the judge, district attorn 1946In State v. Young, 194 La. 1061 , 195 So. 539, 540 , we stated: “Within the meaning of the Code, a crime or offense is made known to an officer ‘having jurisdiction’ when the facts which come to his knowledge are such as to indicate to him that it is his official duty to act or to see that án investigation of the alleged crime is instituted within his jurisdiction.” And in the case' of State v. Cooley, 176 La. 448 , Í46 So. 19, 22, we stated: “The prescription, prescribed by article 8, Code Cr.Proc., begins to run from the date knowledge of the crime is made known to the judge, district attorn | 1 | 1946–1946 |
State v. Oliver
green
2 sentences1946In State v. Oliver, 196 La. 659 , 199 So. 793 , this Court held that in order to invoke the statutory prescription actual knowledge of the commission of a prescriptible offense by a judge, district attorney, or grand jury is not necessary, but only that such officers have notice or such knowledge or information of the facts of a transaction as to put the officer on inquiry. 1946In State v. Oliver, 196 La. 659 , 199 So. 793 , this Court held that in order to invoke the statutory prescription actual knowledge of the commission of a prescriptible offense by a judge, district attorney, or grand jury is not necessary, but only that such officers have notice or such knowledge or information of the facts of a transaction as to put the officer on inquiry. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.