Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1890–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mitchell v. Robinsongreen2 sentences1999Mitchell v. Robinson, 360 S.W.2d 673, 676 (Mo.1962); Lakin v. Postal Life and Cas. 1999Mitchell v. Robinson, 360 S.W.2d 673, 676 (Mo.1962); Lakin v. Postal Life and Cas. | 1 | 1 |
Nenninger v. Department of Social Services, Division of Family Servicesgreen1 sentence1996Nenninger v. Department of Social Servs., Div. of Family Servs., 898 S.W.2d 112, 116 (Mo.App.1995). *234 Officer’s motion to take additional evidence asserted that he had raised jurisdictional issues which needed to be addressed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of St. Louis v. Boecker
green
1 sentence1995Id. at 736-38 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Diamond Lumber, Inc. v. Jonsson
green
1 sentence1994The Ferguson Case In Ferguson v. Board of Police Commissioners of Kansas City, 782 S.W.2d 814 (Mo.App.1990), this court reviewed a decision of the Board of Police Commissioners disciplining an officer for violation of the residence policy. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In Re Driver's License of Spencer
green
1 sentence1985In a spurious attempt to support his contention that failure of the test was the fault of the officer or of the test device, Stewart cites In the Matter of Spencer, 439 S.W.2d 8 (Mo.App.1969). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Chernick
green
2 sentences1979Id. at 746 . 1979Id. at 746 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hyde v. State
green
2 sentences1964In Hyde v. State, 196 Ga. 475 , 26 S.E.2d 744, 753 , the court said: * * figurative, speech has always been regarded as a legitimate weapon in forensic warfare, if there be evidence before the jury on which it may be founded.’ ” In this case the phrase “a little smoke” is well founded and is apt and fair description within the meaning of the test in State v. Tiedt, supra, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant’s objection to this comment. 1964In Hyde v. State, 196 Ga. 475 , 26 S.E.2d 744, 753 , the court said: * * figurative, speech has always been regarded as a legitimate weapon in forensic warfare, if there be evidence before the jury on which it may be founded.’ ” In this case the phrase “a little smoke” is well founded and is apt and fair description within the meaning of the test in State v. Tiedt, supra, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant’s objection to this comment. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Ex parte Creasy
green
1 sentence1917If the circuit court of Cole County had had .no jurisdiction of the contempt proceedings, or if it had exceeded its jurisdiction, or if it had done something in finding petitioner guilty which the law, or even the facts of the contempt charged did not warrant, then we could absolutely discharge petitioner in this proceeding. [Ex parte Creasy, 243 Mo. 679 .] For then the action of the trial court being void, the judgment which it gave would be subject to collateral attack. [2 Freeman on Judgments, see. 619; Hurd on Habeas Corpus, 327.] But the court had jurisdiction of petitioner’s person and o | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Ex parte Gray
neutral
1 sentence1901It was, however, further ruled in Ex parte Gray, supra, that while the minor so improperly sentenced to the penitentiary was entitled to be released from the penitentiary, the statute, sections 1996 and 2659, Eevised Statutes 1879, pro videcl that “no person shall be discharged under the provisions of the habeas corpus act.......for the reason that the judgment was erroneous as to time or place of imprisonment,” but in such case the court or officer hearing the case is required to sentence such person to the propel* place of confinement and for the correct length of time, and cause the officer | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Hunter v. Chandler
neutral
1 sentence1890Hunter v. Chandler, 45 Mo. 452 ; People v. Hartwell, 12 Mich. 508 ; State v. Pierce, 35 Wis. 94 . | 1 | 1890–1890 |
People ex rel. Speed v. Hartwell
green
1 sentence1890Hunter v. Chandler, 45 Mo. 452 ; People v. Hartwell, 12 Mich. 508 ; State v. Pierce, 35 Wis. 94 . | 1 | 1890–1890 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.