Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1950–1982 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.green1 sentence1968(See Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, La.App., 188 So.2d 111, 120, 121 .) Since under our State Constitution (Article VII, Section 29) appellate review in civil cases is ordinarily on the facts as well as the law, we have, rather than remanding the case for a new trial, proceeded to an independent consideration of the facts as revealed in the record before us. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State ex rel. Sorrel v. Foster
neutral
2 sentences1959Sorrel v. Foster, 106 La. 425 , 31 So. 57 , 58, the Supreme Court, in construing the aforesaid statute, stated: “It will be observed this statute changes in an important respect the rule which obtained prior to its enactment. 1951Sorrel v. Foster, 106 La. 425 , 31 So. 57 , 58: “It will be observed this statute changes in an important respect the rule which obtained prior to its enactment. | 2 | 1951–1959 |
State v. Gibson
green
1 sentence1982In State v. Gibson, 391 So.2d 421 (La. 1980), this court adopted the harmless error rule applied in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), saying: "It appears that the Chapman test, i.e., `whether there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction' and *204 that `the court must be able to declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt,' will assist this Court to fulfill both of the requirements of state law. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1982In State v. Gibson, 391 So.2d 421 (La. 1980), this court adopted the harmless error rule applied in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), saying: "It appears that the Chapman test, i.e., `whether there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction' and *204 that `the court must be able to declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt,' will assist this Court to fulfill both of the requirements of state law. 1982In State v. Gibson, 391 So.2d 421 (La. 1980), this court adopted the harmless error rule applied in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967), saying: "It appears that the Chapman test, i.e., `whether there is a reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction' and *204 that `the court must be able to declare a belief that [the error] was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt,' will assist this Court to fulfill both of the requirements of state law. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Noto v. Blasco
green
1 sentence1950As paradoxical as it may seem, both counsel for plaintiff and defendant rely on the case of Noto v. Blasco, La.App., 198 So. 429, 431 , to sustain their respective adverse contentions. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.