Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dawson
green
2 sentences2005State v. Dawson, 343 Ark. 683 , 38 S.W.3d 319 (2001). 2005State v. Dawson, 343 Ark. 683 , 38 S.W.3d 319 (2001). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Arkansas Land & Lumber Co. v. Fitzhugh
neutral
2 sentences1955This is not correct, as already stated.” In Arkansas Land & Lumber Co. v. Fitzhugh, 143 Ark. 122 , 219 S. W. 1022 , in considering the correctness of the following instruction: “No. 3. 1955This is not correct, as already stated.” In Arkansas Land & Lumber Co. v. Fitzhugh, 143 Ark. 122 , 219 S. W. 1022 , in considering the correctness of the following instruction: “No. 3. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Temple Cotton Oil Co. v. Skinner
green
2 sentences1937It is insisted that if the instruction numbered 1 is erroneous in this respect the error was cured by instruction numbered 2, which reads: “You are further instructed that while the plaintiff assumed all the risk ordinarily incident to the work in which he was- engaged, he did not assume the risk of negligence, if any, of the defendant construction company, in its failure to exercise ordinary care to keep the place and surroundings in which he was working in a reasonably safe condition, if it failed to do so, unless he knew, or by the use of ordinary care could have known, of such negligence, 1937It is insisted that if the instruction numbered 1 is erroneous in this respect the error was cured by instruction numbered 2, which reads: “You are further instructed that while the plaintiff assumed all the risk ordinarily incident to the work in which he was- engaged, he did not assume the risk of negligence, if any, of the defendant construction company, in its failure to exercise ordinary care to keep the place and surroundings in which he was working in a reasonably safe condition, if it failed to do so, unless he knew, or by the use of ordinary care could have known, of such negligence, | 1 | 1937–1937 |
Brown v. Creekmore
neutral
1 sentence1925In this respect the principle to he applied is like that in Brown v. Creekmore, 141 Ark. 512 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Horton
green
1 sentence1923Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Horton, 233 U. S. 492 . | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Jackson v. Knowlton
green
2 sentences1912Jackson v. Knowlton, 173 Mass. 94 , 53 N. E. 134 ; McAlees v. Good, (Pa.) 65 Atl. 934 , 10 L. 1912Jackson v. Knowlton, 173 Mass. 94 , 53 N. E. 134 ; McAlees v. Good, (Pa.) 65 Atl. 934 , 10 L. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
McAleer v. Good
green
1 sentence1912Jackson v. Knowlton, 173 Mass. 94 , 53 N. E. 134 ; McAlees v. Good, (Pa.) 65 Atl. 934 , 10 L. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railway Co. v. Pankhurst
neutral
1 sentence1905Appellee cites Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Company v. Pankhurst, 36 Ark. 371, 377 ; Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Company v. Cavenesse, 48 Ark. 106 ; St. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Little Rock & Fort Smith Ry. Co. v. Cavenesse
neutral
1 sentence1905Appellee cites Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Company v. Pankhurst, 36 Ark. 371, 377 ; Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Company v. Cavenesse, 48 Ark. 106 ; St. | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.